Redirect cycle detected for URL, if redirect adds a trailing slash

2019-09-11 Thread Julian Foad
[[[ $ curl --head https://archive.apache.org/dist HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Location: https://archive.apache.org/dist/ ... $ svn ls https://archive.apache.org/dist Redirecting to URL 'https://archive.apache.org/dist': Redirecting to URL 'https://archive.apache.org/dist': svn: E195019: Redire

Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-11 Thread Sam Toliman
Greetings, TLDR since 1.10 subversion loading acl file ~15x times slower, which leads in performance regression in tunnel mode used with svn+ssh scheme. https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.10#authzperf says that performance was improved, but we have discovered regression using larg

Re: Redirect cycle detected for URL, if redirect adds a trailing slash

2019-09-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.09.2019 18:22, Julian Foad wrote: > [[[ > $ curl --head https://archive.apache.org/dist > HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently > Location: https://archive.apache.org/dist/ > ... > > $ svn ls https://archive.apache.org/dist > Redirecting to URL 'https://archive.apache.org/dist': > Redirecting to URL

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.09.2019 18:34, Sam Toliman wrote: > > Greetings, > > TLDR since 1.10 subversion loading acl file ~15x times slower, which > leads in performance regression in tunnel mode used with svn+ssh scheme. > > https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.10#authzperf says > that performance was

Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-11 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:09 AM Julian Foad wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote in thread "Change to Subversion PMC rule for > approving backports": > > Julian Foad wrote: > >> I strongly urge that we simplify any and all of our documentation at any > >> opportunity. Nearly all of it is much too long.

Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-11 Thread Julian Foad
Nathan Hartman wrote: > I've been studying the site and there is a site-ng branch created 2015. I > remember a discussion about it around that time but I can't find it in the > archives now. > Since there are no commits on site-ng beyond branch creation / readme, would > it be agreeable if I c