Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:18:19 +0900:
> Hi,
> I hear that property values may not be vaild UTF-8 string if they are
> set with skipping validation.
Let's be more precise.
In general, a property's name must satisfy the conditions documented in
svn_prop_name_is_valid()'s
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 18:23:00 +:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > +++ subversion/site/publish/.message-ids.tsv Fri Dec 7 12:29:56 2018
> > > +# Message-ids of archived emails that are referenced by a svn.haxx.se
> > > URL.
> > > +# Generated by tools/haxx-url-to-message-id.sh
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 18:29:31 +:
> It would be good for visibility if we could show on the web site what changes
> are waiting to be released in maintenance branches. Both merged and nominated
> changes.
>
Sure.
> How could we implement that to get an acceptable display
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 18:23:00 +:
> > Robustness: teach it to only accumulate new entries, and not to wipe the
> > file when there's a network glitch.
>
> That's easy enough: just write 'set -e' [or use] double ampersands
I have done that but I thin
Thank you to make my question clear.
Actually, I misunderstood property values and its validation.
On 12/11/18 5:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Generic APIs that work on any property should return bytes. More
specific APIs that work on properties that have further restrictions
(svn:needs-lock, sv
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:08:29 +:
> Added '-q'etc.
>
Thanks.
> I also made it:
> * not commit if the only change is in the the "# Generated ... " line.
> * search only in the "publish" subtree, so it doesn't pick up the example
> in its own script
I don't think it w
Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:22 +0900:
> On 12/11/18 5:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Generic APIs that work on any property should return bytes. More
> > specific APIs that work on properties that have further restrictions
> > (svn:needs-lock, svn:date), or even a structured v
Hi,
On 2018/12/10 22:37, Michael Pilato wrote:
Most of the patch is fine. Besides some minor code formatting tweaks,
there's only one bit I really changed when committing (as r1848577):
Thanks for the reviewing and tweaking.
Reconsidering the checking instance of svn_stream_t in
svn_swig_py
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > * search only in the "publish" subtree, so it doesn't pick up the example
> > in its own script
>
> I don't think it will pick up the example in its own source, because the
> regexp therein doesn't match itself.
It found the "2010-01/0001" example in the script's comme
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:26 +:
> It found the "2010-01/0001" example in the script's comments, not the
> regex itself, in r1848647.
Speaking of which, when I tested the script locally it added some more
URLs that it found in svn-base files in my working copy (due to [1]); that
Julian Foad wrote on 2018-12-07:
> (From my thoughts on svn community development:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SVN/What%27s+In+My+Head#What'sInMyHead-Integratearchives/logs,permalinks,searching
> )
> An important step is to develop a URL "permalink" scheme to refer to our
> va
11 matches
Mail list logo
