On 20.09.2015 09:40, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 20 September 2015 at 00:53, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 19.09.2015 19:20, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 19 September 2015 at 17:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 19 September 2015 at 14:03, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.09.2015 13:12, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 21 September 2015 at 12:47, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.09.2015 09:40, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 20 September 2015 at 00:53, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 19.09.2015 19:20, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 19 September 2015 at 17:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 19 September 2015 at 14:03, Branko Čibej
On 21 September 2015 at 12:53, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 12:47, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.09.2015 09:40, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 20 September 2015 at 00:53, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 19.09.2015 19:20, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 19 September 2015 at 17:24, Ivan Zhakov
On 18 September 2015 at 17:43, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> The 1.9.2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
### Text below is pasted from 1.9.1, not finished edited it for 1.9.2...
SUMMARY:
+1 to release (Unix)
VERIFIED:
-
SHA1 sums:
fb9db3b7ddf48ae37aa8785872301b59
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
> Sent: maandag 21 september 2015 11:53
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge ra-reuse-session branch to trunk or not?
> >
> > Here's one more data point that has nothing to do with Ja
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
> The 1.9.2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on September 30th
> so please
Behaviour of 'svnadmin dump' has changed in 1.9: a no-op change to
path X comes into the dump file without "Text-content" block (there is
still a "Node-action: change" to the path X). The consequence is that
the no-op change disappears when you load this into a new repository.
When you dump from th
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
> In our repository, there are a couple of such revisions, dating from
> our conversion from cvs to svn (actually, revision N-1 contains a real
> change, but only a short log message; and revision N has a no-op
> change to that same path,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:43:52PM +0300, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> The 1.9.2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on September 30th
> so
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Debian/stable 64-bit
Tested:
(local, svn, serf, serf/v1) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb, fsx)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb, ctypes-python
javahl x (fsfs, bdb, fsx)
Results:
FAIL svnadmin_tests.py 32, 33, 34 and 35, and svnfsfs_tests.py 1 with
pack/
On 18 September 2015 at 18:43, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
> The 1.9.2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on September 30th
> so please tr
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> ### Text below is pasted from 1.9.1, not finished edited it for 1.9.2...
Oops, I had in fact finished editing this text, but better safe than
sorry. Repeating myself without that disclaimer:
SUMMARY:
+1 to release (Unix)
VERIFIED:
-
SHA1 sums:
fb9db3b7dd
Stefan wrote on Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:52:09 +0200:
> Hi,
> >5. What mailing list will issue notifications go to?
> >We already have
> >issues@subversion:https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-issues/
> That mailing list isn't listed on the mailing-lists page:
> http://subversion.ap
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 16:38:20 +0200:
> In [jcorvel's company's] repository, there are a couple of such revisions,
> dating from
> our conversion from cvs to svn (actually, revision N-1 contains a real
> change, but only a short log message; and revision N has a no-op
> cha
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 00:00:42 +0200:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Stefan wrote:
> > On 19/09/2015 22:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Stefan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 19/09/2015 22:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>>
> >
kot...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 15:19:46 -:
> Author: kotkov
> Date: Mon Sep 21 15:19:40 2015
> New Revision: 1704317
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1704317&view=rev
> Log:
> Use compressed svndiff1 format for deltas when committing changes over
> http:// and https:/
Last week I performed some performance tests on various types of
backends (FSFS formats 6 and 7, and FSX) served by 1.9, on machines
that are similar to our company's production svn setup. This is a
Solaris Sparc t5 with back-end on a Netapp cluster mounted via NFS;
client is a Windows client over
17 matches
Mail list logo
