Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> In FSFS, use sub-pools for temporaries in those API function implementations
> that call open_path().
>
> All these functions are complex enough to make the overhead of creating a
> temporary sub-pool be outweighed by the benefits of tighter memory usage and
> better iso
Hi there,
FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules,
mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that
complies to our rules but also refines them.
I'd like to amend our coding guideline with the following
suggestions (not as a strict requirement). The first one is
actually "ne
Hi
I am trying to compile/run 1.8.11 svn tests with recently released ruby
2.2 and ruby swig test fails. See the output below. Looking at
run-test.rb code I do not see anything obviously wrong.
Can anybody reproduce the same problem?
[anatol@argo subversion-1.8.11]$ make check-swig-rb
if [ "LD
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > In FSFS, use sub-pools for temporaries in those API function
> implementations
> > that call open_path().
> >
> > All these functions are complex enough to make the overhead of creating a
> > temporary sub-pool
On 29.12.2014 13:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules,
> mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that
> complies to our rules but also refines them.
>
> I'd like to amend our coding guideline with the following
> suggestions (n
Hi
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to compile/run 1.8.11 svn tests with recently released ruby
> 2.2 and ruby swig test fails. See the output below. Looking at
> run-test.rb code I do not see anything obviously wrong.
>
> Can anybody reproduce the same
Translation status report for trunk@r1648479
lang trans untrans fuzzy obs
--
de2872 3 7 490 +~o
es2264 611 829 528 ++U~~~
fr2568 307
7 matches
Mail list logo
