Re: svn:auto-props on project root (was Re: svn commit: r1617096 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509/subversion: include/svn_x509.h libsvn_subr/x509.h libsvn_subr/x509info.c libsvn_subr/x509parse.

2014-09-02 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 18 August 2014 12:39, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 18.08.2014 09:21, Julian Foad wrote: > > Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > * subversion/include/svn_x509.h > * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509.h > * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509info.c > * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509parse.c > * subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/x50

Re: svn:auto-props on project root (was Re: svn commit: r1617096 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509/subversion: include/svn_x509.h libsvn_subr/x509.h libsvn_subr/x509info.c libsvn_subr/x509parse.

2014-09-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.09.2014 10:50, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 18 August 2014 12:39, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 18.08.2014 09:21, Julian Foad wrote: >> >> Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> >> * subversion/include/svn_x509.h >> * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509.h >> * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509info.c >> * subversion/libsvn_subr

Re: svn:auto-props on project root (was Re: svn commit: r1617096 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509/subversion: include/svn_x509.h libsvn_subr/x509.h libsvn_subr/x509info.c libsvn_subr/x509parse.

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: >>> May be it's already discussed, but do someone have objections on >>> settings 'svn:auto-props' on project root with content like this: >>> [[[ >>>   svn:auto-props >>>     *.py = svn:eol-style=native >>>     *.c = svn:eol-style=native >>>     *.h = svn:eol-style=native >>> ]

Re: svn:auto-props on project root (was Re: svn commit: r1617096 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509/subversion: include/svn_x509.h libsvn_subr/x509.h libsvn_subr/x509info.c libsvn_subr/x509parse.

2014-09-02 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 2 September 2014 14:26, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.09.2014 10:50, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> On 18 August 2014 12:39, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 18.08.2014 09:21, Julian Foad wrote: >>> >>> Ivan Zhakov wrote: >>> >>> * subversion/include/svn_x509.h >>> * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509.h >>> * subv

Re: Segmentation fault during diff generation

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: > The attached brute-force patch seems to fix many of the cases where > changelist > filtering was missing or wrong, but I don't much like it and haven't > properly tested it. So here, attached, is an implementation of the post-filtering approach. This is implemented usi

RE: Segmentation fault during diff generation

2014-09-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com] > Sent: dinsdag 2 september 2014 13:45 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: 'Peter Galcik'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Segmentation fault during diff generation > > I (Julian Foad) wrote: > > The attached brut

Re: Segmentation fault during diff generation

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Foad
Bert Huijben wrote: >> So here, attached, is an implementation of the post-filtering approach. >> This is implemented using a common filter for repos-WC and WC-WC diffs. >> [...] > > I really like this approach. > > I think we should commit it and improve from there. (I can't see why it > would b

Re: Segmentation fault during diff generation

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: > Thanks. r1621978. (That's almost exactly the patch I posted here, but after > I cleaned up some unused variables and obsolete comments.) Simplified, and removed a stray debug print, in r1621981. - Julian

Re: Segmentation fault during diff generation

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: >>  Thanks. r1621978. (That's almost exactly the patch I posted here, but after >>  I cleaned up some unused variables and obsolete comments.) > > Simplified, and removed a stray debug print, in r1621981. Nominated for backport to 1.8.x in 1622023. - Julian

Re: [PATCH] Introduce per-instance filesystem UUIDs

2014-09-02 Thread Ben Reser
On 8/20/14 9:13 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > I think part of the problem here has been we (as in WANdisco folks) have > discussed the idea of an instance ID for repositories in the past to solve the > range of replacing the repository without clearing the cache issues. But this > change is being added f

Re: [PATCH] Introduce per-instance filesystem UUIDs

2014-09-02 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Ben Reser writes: >> I think part of the problem here has been we (as in WANdisco folks) have >> discussed the idea of an instance ID for repositories in the past to solve >> the range of replacing the repository without clearing the cache issues. >> But this change is being added for a very diff