Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests

2014-07-15 Thread Neels Hofmeyr
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:23:14PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.07.2014 17:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > On 07/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > >> My technical opinion that FSFS7/log addressing is slower by design, > >> because it's doing more (read index, then read data instead of j

Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests

2014-07-15 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:23:14PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 07.07.2014 17:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> > On 07/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> >> My technical opinion that FSFS7/log addressing is slower by design, >> >> be

Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests

2014-07-15 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.07.2014 20:44, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> ... it makes SVN parse the >> whole 64k block that the OS provides anyway ... > > [off-topic] > > See, this is the kind of statement that makes me uneasy. You make an > assertion about "the OS" (or