On 2014-02-17 16:39:56 +, Philip Martin wrote:
> You might be able to use socat to debug the traffic. Run a socat relay
> on the client machine, something like:
>
> socat -v TCP-LISTEN:9630,reuseaddr,fork OPENSSL:svn.apache.org:443,verify=0
>
> then run the client command, something like:
On 17.02.2014 18:36, Julian Foad wrote:
> Marc Strapetz wrote:
>
>>> ... I'll dig into the cache code ...
>>
>> I did that now and the storage is quite simple: we have a main file
>> which contains the diff (added, removed) for every path in every
>> revision and a revision-based index file with c
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:vincent-...@vinc17.net]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 februari 2014 11:18
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: E175013 svn diff failure (access forbidden) with 1.8.5
(regression)
>
> On 2014-02-17 16:39:56 +, Philip Martin wrote:
>
Marc Strapetz wrote:
> On 17.02.2014 18:36, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Marc Strapetz wrote:
>>> Hence an API like the following should work well for us:
>>>
>>> interface MergeinfoDiffCallback {
>>> void mergeinfoDiff(int revision,
>>> Map pathToAddedMergeinfo,
>>>
stef...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Mon Jan 20 16:23:15 2014
> New Revision: 1559767
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1559767
> Log:
> Speed up txdelta for non-deltifyable sections. This alone speeds up
> the commit of a 1GB random data file form 28s to 14s.
>
> The idea is to use
On 2/17/14, 3:27 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> The 1.8.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
On 2/17/14, 12:38 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> I know that on the svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc slave (currently residing in my
> basement), the scripts are updated manually. I may even have local edits that
> aren't yet in the repository.
I suspected as much. Can I possibly get access to this machine to wo
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/17/14, 12:38 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> > I know that on the svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc slave (currently residing in my
> > basement), the scripts are updated manually. I may even have local
> edits that
> > aren't yet in the repository.
>
> I s
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/17/14, 3:27 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.8.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please ge
On 2/18/14, 12:22 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Now, this wasn't an error path (just a commit
> that should have succeeded and should've written something to stdout).
> I'm not sure how I can determine that this is the likely cause ... I
> can't seem to reproduce it, no matter h
Ben Reser writes:
> On 2/18/14, 12:22 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint. Now, this wasn't an error path (just a commit
>> that should have succeeded and should've written something to stdout).
>> I'm not sure how I can determine that this is the likely cause ... I
>> can't seem to
The 1.7.16 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on February
26th so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by February 24th.
Philip Martin writes:
> $ valgrind -q .libs/lt-random-test 2
> ==19698== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==19698==at 0x402EAA3: bcmp (mc_replace_strmem.c:935)
> ==19698==by 0x4052114: find_block (xdelta.c:201)
> ==19698==by 0x4052314: find_match (xdelta.c:
13 matches
Mail list logo
