> -Original Message-
> From: julianf...@apache.org [mailto:julianf...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 01:08
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1449428 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/tree_conflict_tests.py
>
> Author: julianfoad
> Date:
Hi,
When auto-props are set up for e.g., cpp files that set the
svn:eol-style property, adding those files is not possible if the file
has inconsistent line endings.
The --force flag won't help either, the only way to add the file is to
first fix the line endings in an editor.
Or add the file
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 15:39
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> Hi,
>
> When auto-props are set up for e.g., cpp files that set the
> svn:eol-style property, a
On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 15:39
To: Subversion Development
Subject: svn add and inconsistent line endings
Hi,
When auto-props are set up for e.g., cpp files that set the
s
On 24.02.2013 17:00, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 15:39
>>> To: Subversion Development
>>> Subject: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>>>
On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
added? That's less likely to get out of date.
For example
% svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 17:01
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Mes
On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
>> added? That's less likely to get out of date.
>>
>> For example
>>
>> % svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD
>> subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-r
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 17:31
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> On 24.02.2013 17:00, Stefan Küng wrote:
> > On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >>
>
On 24.02.2013 18:59, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 17:31
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>>
>> On 24.02.2013 17:00, Stefan Küng wrote:
>>>
On 24/02/13 17:57, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
"svn diff" on which target? :)
Well, "svn diff -c 858288" works great, so I assumed that it's legit :>
(now I have to wonder _why_ this works, heh)
If I run your command on the root of a trunk checkout, th
On 24.02.2013 18:56, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 17:01
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: 'Subversion Development'
Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
On 24.02.2013 16:47, Bert Huijben wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 19:15
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> On 24.02.2013 18:56, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Mes
On 24.02.2013 19:14, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 24/02/13 17:57, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
>
>> "svn diff" on which target? :)
>>
>
> Well, "svn diff -c 858288" works great, so I assumed that it's legit :>
>
> (now I have to wonder _why_ this works, heh)
>
>
On 24.02.2013 19:29, Bert Huijben wrote:
Are you sure the file is adjusted?
Looking at the code it appears we just skip the check (and many others
for
other properties).
You're right. And I just tested: even if the property is set (indicating
inconsistent eols should be either ignored or co
On 24.02.2013 19:29, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 19:15
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: 'Subversion Development'
>> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>>
>> On 24.02.2013 18:56, Be
On 24.02.2013 19:42, Branko Čibej wrote:
Regarding automatcially changing line endings -- we don't do that for a
very good reason: it's always been Subversion's policy to not touch file
contents unless explicitly told to do so. The line endings could be
inconsistent for reasons beyond Subversion
On 24.02.2013 19:47, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 24.02.2013 19:42, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Regarding automatcially changing line endings -- we don't do that for a
>> very good reason: it's always been Subversion's policy to not touch file
>> contents unless explicitly told to do so. The line endings c
On 24.02.2013 20:45, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 24.02.2013 19:47, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 24.02.2013 19:42, Branko Čibej wrote:
Regarding automatcially changing line endings -- we don't do that for a
very good reason: it's always been Subversion's policy to not touch file
contents unless explicitly
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 20:55
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>
> On 24.02.2013 20:45, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 24.02.2013 19:47, Stefan Küng wrote:
> >>
Failed to build Revision: 1449572.
Ok here's my latest stab at it. So far everything seems to work as
expected, even when you have unsaved edits in the same working
copy but are working in a subdir that doesn't contain unsaved edits.
I will keep testing but am really just looking for some support from
a full committer so I can com
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> OK. Fair enough. I'm convinced that these headers should be added.
Committed in r1449592 without the revision on the Message-ID. In the
case of lock events no revision is available. In the case of revprop
property changes it's not uniqu
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Shouldn't all the instructions be "build it yourself", as we seem agreed to
> rip out in-tree builds of dependent packages?
If it was going to stay `./configure; make; make install` for a long
time then I'd probably document it that way. But i
On 24.02.2013 22:29, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: zondag 24 februari 2013 20:55
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn add and inconsistent line endings
>>
>> On 24.02.2013 20:45, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
