On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 08:05:52AM -, bre...@apache.org wrote:
> +class ChecksumTestCases(unittest.TestCase):
> +def test_checksum(self):
> +# Checking primarily the return type for the svn_checksum_create
> +# function
> +val = svn.core.svn_checksum_create(svn.core.
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> >>> 2) Am I the only one who wants to protect his repository
On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>>> wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 21:15:24 +0100:
> 2) Am I the
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>>> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wro
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:51:08 +0100:
> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
> >> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >>> wrote:
> Johan Cor
Hi,
This patch is a follow up of the long discussion we had in thread [1].
This patch implements a new switch "--keep-going" to svnadmin verify.
If "--keep-going" is set(True), svnadmin verify would continue to run
till verifying all the revisions i.e, it would not stop at the very
first occ
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:51:08 +0100:
>> On 10.12.2012 11:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 00:26:20 +0100:
>> >> On 10.12.2012 00:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 10 december 2012 8:04
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: enforcing LF-normalization for svn:eol-style=native files (issue
> #4065)
>
> On 10.12.2012 07:35, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > I don’t th
Prabhu Gnana Sundar
> This patch is a follow up of the long discussion we had in thread [1]. This
> patch implements a new switch "--keep-going" to svnadmin verify.
>
> If "--keep-going" is set(True), svnadmin verify would continue to run
> till verifying all the revisions i.e, it would not sto
> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
> ===
> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py(revision 1411074)
> +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py(working copy)
> @@ -1835,6 +1835,114 @@
>
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 14:45:57 +:
> I scanned quickly through your patch and I noticed one place where you
> declare a local function without the 'static' keyword. I expect this should
> give a warning when you compile it, so please will you compile with and
> without yo
Filed a ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5623
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:42:26 +0200:
> Currently http://subversion.apache.org/buildbot contains a mixture of
> builds for all active branches (trunk, 1.6.x, 1.7.x). That makes it
> unfeasible to track the stat
> -Original Message-
> From: julianf...@apache.org [mailto:julianf...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 10 december 2012 17:29
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1419560 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_update_move.c
>
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Mon D
On 12/07/2012 02:39 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> AFAIK, it is only dump where the svnrdump tool fails when using Serf.
>> Because of the Ev1 stuff. Using bulk-updates ought to avoid that
>> issue.
>
> Actually, my proposed hack of forcing ra_serf to use bulk update mode
> is not going to work. I
Bert Huijben wrote:
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1419560&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_update_move.c
>> (update_working_file): Update a comment.
>> @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ update_working_file(svn_skel_t **work_it
>> old_version->pr
As I said on IRC, happy to look into this, my main question is how
transform_sql.py would know what files to scan for the MAP_DELETED <->
'base-deleted' mappings.
Do we want a header file with a well-known name
(subversion/include/private/)? Maybe in the same directory as the
source .sql file? M
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Philip - perhaps you can move the relevant definitions to that header?
> Then I'll follow up with a transform_sql.py patch.
OK, I've done that. I didn't annotate the maps or elements in any way.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 16:57:26 +:
> svn_wc__db_op_set_property() uses a txn internally, but is being
> called within a larger 'outer txn' (sorry if the terminology is wrong)
"Savepoint"?
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_savepoint.html
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
[...]
>> The argument is that a Subversion server should be enforcing
>> Subversion's invariants.
>>
>> That said, I'm not opposed to doing it via standard hooks. It's a good
>> w
On 12/03/2012 07:39 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> I think adding "vacuum" to cleanup is a reasonable first step. "cleanup" is
> an explicit operation that a user could reasonably expect to take some
> non-trivial amount of time. We already remove unneeded pristines during
> cleanup, might as well d
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just another crazy idea:
>
> The main problem with the parallelization in ra_serf seems to be the number
> of http requests (which potentially causes a high number of authentications
> and tcp connections).
>
> Maybe we
Log Message:
Improve support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings
* subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py: Improved test_checksum
Review by: danielsh
Modified:
subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py
Regards,
Shivani Poddar
Bachelors in Computer Sciences a
The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.
Thanks!
Shivani Poddar wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:22:28 +0530:
> Log Message:
>
> Improve support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings
> * subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py: Improved test_checksum
>
Need a blank line before the * line, and to use the "* file\n (symbol)"
syntax ---
Philip Martin wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 17:49:44 +:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Philip - perhaps you can move the relevant definitions to that header?
> > Then I'll follow up with a transform_sql.py patch.
>
> OK, I've done that. I didn't annotate the maps or elements in any way.
Imp
Dear All,
My name is Gabriela Gibson and I've applied for the internship with
Subversion under the Gnome Outreach for Women Program.
I am an ex-wizardess who used to haunt a long-lost MUD. I've not
programmed in a while, although I've *intended* to join more than one
open-source project in the
[[[
Test for issue #4263: svnrdump: E125005: Cannot accept non-LF line
endings in 'svn:log' property
* subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py
copy_bad_line_endings_load: Test for \r line ending bug in svnrdump
(issue 4263)
]]]
Index: svnrdump_tests.py
==
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 00:21:19 +:
> For my initial submission I have written a test for issue 4263 which
> I'll mail shortly. I admit that I struggled to figure out how to
> connect gdb to svnrdump in my build tree (since svnrdump is actually a
> shell script, and svnrd
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 00:21:46 +:
>
Thanks for the patch, a few quick comments:
> [[[
> Test for issue #4263: svnrdump: E125005: Cannot accept non-LF line
> endings in 'svn:log' property
>
> * subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py
>copy_bad_line_endings_load:
So I managed to figure out the problem. It was a socket leak, caused by me
failing to destroy a pool inside a function called in a loop.
My apologies for disturbing people.
On 2012-11-27 9:33 AM, "Robert Turner" wrote:
>Thanks for the reply.
>
>So I spent ages digging into this (and related is
Dear All,
My name is Gabriela Gibson and I've applied for the internship with
Subversion under the Gnome Outreach for Women Program.
I am an ex-wizardess who used to haunt a long-lost MUD. I've not
programmed in a while, although I've *intended* to join more than one
open-source project in the
[[[
Test for issue #4263: svnrdump: E125005: Cannot accept non-LF line
endings in 'svn:log' property
* subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py
copy_bad_line_endings_load: Test for \r line ending bug in svnrdump
(issue 4263)
]]]
Index: svnrdump_tests.py
==
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
SUMMARY:
-
+1 to release
VERIFIED:
On 12/10/2012 07:32 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Gabriela Gibson wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 00:21:19 +:
>> For my initial submission I have written a test for issue 4263 which
>> I'll mail shortly. I admit that I struggled to figure out how to
>> connect gdb to svnrdump in my build tree (sinc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Shivani Poddar wrote on Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:22:28 +0530:
> > Log Message:
> >
> > Improve support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings
> > * subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py: Improved
> test_checksum
> >
>
> Need a blank
35 matches
Mail list logo
