On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Before I look into this further, I'd like to know if anyone else has seen
> this or can reproduce this (or doesn't reproduce this with a similar
> environment) ...
>
> Tests 12 and 15 of mergeinfo-test.exe and test 4 of skel-test.exe hang o
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:54:07PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > I just came across something that reminded me of this thread.
> > > It seems PostgreSQL is doing something q
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:47:51AM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> I'd like to see all that solved and SHM being used
> for membuffer - which has been designed with that
> goal in mind. It's the robustness part that makes it
> so much harder to do than I thought back then.
Right. I see. Thanks for
On 11/05/2012 08:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> My debugging indicates that when close_all_dirs() is called, there are a
>> slew of unclosed directories which each have a non-zero ref_count. Save for
>> the root directory of the edit
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 09:54:56PM +0530, vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'
> [Issue #4225] [1].
>
> All tests pass with 'make check' & 'make davautocheck'.
>
> Attached the patch and log message.
>
> Please review this patch and share your
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:24 PM, vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch implements '--include-externals' option to 'svn list' [Issue
> #4225] [1].
>
> All tests pass with 'make check' & 'make davautocheck'.
>
> Attached the patch and log message.
>
> Please review this patch and share your thoughts.
>
I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
figure it out..
Ultimately the problem proved to be that he had this directive:
Timeout 3
Which would mean if we don't tend a connection for 3 seconds Apache
w
On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 08:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:33 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>> My debugging indicates that when close_all_dirs() is called, there are a
>>> slew of unclosed directories which each have a non-ze
On 11/06/2012 10:29 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Sorry, that section is out of date, I corrected it. The
>>> --no-ignores option still works for status, it's only for import and
>>> add that it can't be overridden.
>>>
>>
>> Perfect, thanks. I think not-overriding for add/import is fine: for
>>
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
> he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
> figure it out..
>
> Ultimately the problem proved to be that he had this directive:
> Timeout 3
>
>
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 10:29 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Sorry, that section is out of date, I corrected it. The
--no-ignores option still works for status, it's only for
import and add that it can't be overridden.
>>>
>>> Perfect, thanks. I think not-overriding
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> On 11/06/2012 10:29 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Sorry, that section is out of date, I corrected it. The
> --no-ignores option still works for status, it's only for
> import and add that it can't be ove
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Ben,
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
>> he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
>> figure it out..
>>
>> Ultimate
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hi Paul.
>
> While arguing over some details in other email threads, I just want to say
> I'm very excited and impressed that you've taken on the inheritable
> properties feature and achieved a design that seems to be quite powerful and
> fl
Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2012 10:29 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Sorry, that section is out of date, I corrected it. The
>> --no-ignores option still works for status, it's only for
>> import and
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
>> Hi, merge fans and QA fans.
>>
>> As you've seen, the 'symmetric merge' code is live in trunk and destined to
>> be in 1.8.
>>
>> The principle is nice; however, the current implementati
Paul Burba wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> What about all these two XFailing tests?
>>
>> merge_automatic_tests.py 16 'cherry2_fwd'
>> merge_automatic_tests.py 17 'cherry3_fwd
>>
>> Are you working on those? Are they blockers for 1.8? Any existing
>> iss
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
>>> he's been seeing. I ended up havi
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 15:29:33 +:
> - Original Message -
> > From: Daniel Shahaf
> > To: Paul Burba
> > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 5 November 2012, 22:23
> > Subject: Re: disregarding svn:global-ignores
> >
> > Paul Burba wrote on Mon, Nov 05,
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Perfect, thanks. I think not-overriding for add/import is fine: for
>> > 'import' only the repository files are affected, and for 'add' files
>> > matching the pattern can be specified explicitly in the argv targets
>> >
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
I worked with Philip today and was able to repr
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> > Perfect, thanks. I think not-overriding for add/import is fine: for
>>> > 'import' only the repository files are affected, and for 'add' files
>>> > matching the pa
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
>> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
>>> Julian Foad wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Perfect, thanks. I think not-overriding for add/import is fine: for
> 'import' only the repository
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:06:51PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> /bike-shed note: why property named "svn:global-ignores", not
> "svn:global-ignore"? It will be looking more consistent with
> "svn:ignore".
The name mirrors the "global-ignores" option in the configuration file.
That's not a very stro
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:06:51PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > /bike-shed note: why property named "svn:global-ignores", not
> > "svn:global-ignore"? It will be looking more consistent with
> > "svn:ignore".
>
> The name mirrors the "glo
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:06:51PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> > /bike-shed note: why property named "svn:global-ignores", not
>> > "svn:global-ignore"? It will be looking more c
Please see this thread from Subclipse mailing list:
http://svn.haxx.se/subusers/archive-2012-11/0001.shtml
Basically, a user has a recipe where an svn update has text conflicts.
In addition to the usual conflict files, there is also a file named
"foo.txt.edited" created. I can see in libsvn_wc/
It seems like this is the relevant commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=871101
Not sure how the behavior may have been amended since that commit as
it is kind of old. But the log message would explain why I did not
see it when I tried to do this as I did not take the (E)di
On 11/06/2012 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I recall this patch of yours -- I even asked you about it post-Berlin. I'll
>> take a look at it now and see if it can help us out.
>
> Not seeing the active_dir_propfinds list corruption you me
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:06:51PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> > /bike-shed note: why property named "svn:global-ignores"
Think this turns out to be a bug with SVNKit only. It appears to
create this file even when postponing conflict resolution. Sorry for
the noise.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> It seems like this is the relevant commit:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&rev
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:00:52PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
>> These six XFailing upate tests are all part of this effort correct?
>>
>> 61XFAIL update locally moved dir with leaf del
>> 62XFAIL update locally moved dir with edited
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:03:32PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Please see this thread from Subclipse mailing list:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/subusers/archive-2012-11/0001.shtml
>
> Basically, a user has a recipe where an svn update has text conflicts.
> In addition to the usual conflict files, th
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> At the risk of getting something thrown at me: after reading
>>> Julian's arguments, I was thinking "svn:recursive-ignore" might
>>> be a better name. It d
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Before I look into this further, I'd like to know if anyone else has seen
>> this or can reproduce this (or doesn't reproduce this with a similar
>> environment) ...
>>
>> Tests
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
I worked with Philip today and was able to repr
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
>>> he's been seeing. I ended up
patch attached
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> Ben,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
I worked with Phili
Lieven Govaerts writes:
>> Philip or Ben, can you test that with this patch svn will always stop
>> with a communication error?
Using serf 1.1.x patched and Subversion 1406366 I get this new error:
Awc/1.3.0-rc1/subversion/libsvn_subr/config.c
../src/subversion/svn/checkout-cmd.c:168: (apr_
Philip Martin writes:
> but I still see this as well:
>
> A
> wc/1.3.0-rc1/subversion/bindings/java/javahl/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl/SVNAdmin.java
> ../src/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:680: (apr_err=235000)
> svn: E235000: In file '../src/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c' line
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 10:15 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 08:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> I recall this patch of yours -- I even asked you about it post-Berlin. I'll
>>> take a look at it now and see if it can help us out.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Another problem is how serf reads data from network in case of
> multiple connections: it reads data from one connection until EAGAIN.
> But if data comes from network really fast (from local server for
> example) it continue reading data from t
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> okay, so with the Timeout directive added I can reproduce this issue.
>
> What I see is that the server closes the connection in the middle of
> sending a response to the client. It doesn't even finalize the
> response first.
> So ra_serf i
I am also very interested in seeing this get to a state of usability - I am
willing to help also.
If there is a current status or anyone working on this, I would love to
pitch in and get this finalized.
--
View this message in context:
http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-enabling-rub
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
Ben,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ben Reser
Paul Burba wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:01:54 -0500:
> Also keep in mind that if you really want to add an ignored file you
> can make the file the target of the 'svn add' command. Just like with
> the runtime config global-ignores and the svn:ignore property in 1.7,
> if the file in question
46 matches
Mail list logo
