On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.09.2012 23:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> Fnmatch support is in apr(-util?) and has known access/performance patterns,
>>> so we might be able to move the search handling t
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:52:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
> fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktimjwqifcmss3b6s2gwvrkyglct2-bd6b-jiz...@mail
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:43:00AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> My first thought on the pattern matching was can we have a way to specify
> revisions where svn:log MATCHES "[Mm]erge" AND svn:author DOES NOT MATCH
> "julian".
>
> In other words, two things:
>
> 1. specify a match against a part
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The 1.6.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
>
> Please note the following known test fail
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Li
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:07:13 +0200:
> Overall, I like all of your suggestions, but I don't see a need for
> us to implement them all for 1.8. In my mind, these are nice bite-size
> tasks for our issue tracker that new contributors could pick up.
> So I'd suggest filing a "
I'm happy to announce the release of Subversion 1.6.19.
To download this release, please visit:
http://subversion.apache.org/download/#supported-releases
The SHA1 checksums are:
298f42561a841ae9712ed8f2f83caf4120043ff4 subversion-1.6.19.zip
b4703fc956194f0712194506391794746f61be4e su
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
>
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:07:13 +0200:
> > Overall, I like all of your suggestions, but I don't see a need for
> > us to implement them all for 1.8. In my mind, these are nice bite-size
> > tasks for our issue t
On 21.09.2012 11:07, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:07:13 +0200:
>>> Overall, I like all of your suggestions, but I don't see a need for
>>> us to implement them all for 1.8. In my mind, the
On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
> tested with 0.7
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:27:28PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.09.2012 16:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> > I just noticed that SmartSVN has been acquired by Wandisco [1].
>> >
>> > IMHO, one of the nice features of SmartSVN's profess
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:10:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Is doing this in the log receiver really any faster than filtering in a
> custom callback handler, or even a script?
It's not. And it is not about the speed of the filtering itself.
It is much more convenient to have this built in, es
On 21 September 2012 10:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> ... a source of inspiration ...
I see what you did there :-)
--
Mat Booth
Software Engineer
WANdisco, Inc.
http://www.wandisco.com
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 21 September 2012 10:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> ... a source of inspiration ...
>
> I see what you did there :-)
Heh. To be clear: I haven't seen the code :-). But I've used the trial
version of SmartSVN a couple of times to repair wo
On 21.09.2012 11:28, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:10:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Is doing this in the log receiver really any faster than filtering in a
>> custom callback handler, or even a script?
> It's not. And it is not about the speed of the filtering itself.
> I
I changed the subject line. And...
Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.09.2012 11:28, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> It is much more convenient to have this built in, especially on
>> platforms that don't have nice post-processing tools installed
>> by default (e.g. Windows).
>
> OK.
>
>> I've been usi
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 13:34:57 +0200:
> My point is that, if we want to add regular expression support at a
> later time, we can invent a "regex" production that'll fit into the
> query syntax, instead of doubling the number of options for each command
> that supports searching
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:21 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 21 September 2012 10:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >>
> >> ... a source of inspiration ...
> >
> > I see what you did there :-)
>
> Heh. To be clear: I haven't seen the code :
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:07:20 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:07:13 +0200:
> > > Overall, I like all of your suggestions, but I don't see a need for
> > > us to implement them all f
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:21 +0200:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
>> > On 21 September 2012 10:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> >>
>> >> ... a source of inspiration ...
>> >
>> > I see what you
On 09/21/2012 04:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> How about having just the --search option and creating a simple query
> language parser using parenthesis, AND, NOT and OR operators? I'd even
> consider making such searching always case-insensitive, at least for log
> messages; alternatively, the quer
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 14:52:59 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:21 +0200:
> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> >> > On 21 September 2012 10:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:00:08AM -0700, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/21/2012 04:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > How about having just the --search option and creating a simple query
> > language parser using parenthesis, AND, NOT and OR operators? I'd even
> > consider making such searching al
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:07:24PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> One idea stands out as an immediate improvement: have the basic, simple,
> generic search commands be case-insensitive. Instead of the present
>
> --search
> --isearch (or was it --i-search? no, just playing mind games),
> --se
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:18:47PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:07:24PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > One idea stands out as an immediate improvement: have the basic, simple,
> > generic search commands be case-insensitive. Instead of the present
> >
> > --search
Need to add them to archive.a.o as well?
s...@tigris.org wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:41:49 -0700:
> Author: stsp
> Date: 2012-09-21 01:41:48-0700
> New Revision: 124
>
> Added:
>trunk/www/downloads/subversion-1.6.19.tar.bz2 (contents, props changed)
>trunk/www/downloads/subversion-
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Need to add them to archive.a.o as well?
Dunno. Are these supposed to be distributed by ASF infrastructure?
They don't have the APLv2 licence on them.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 16:47:41 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Need to add them to archive.a.o as well?
>
> Dunno. Are these supposed to be distributed by ASF infrastructure?
> They don't have the APLv2 licence on them.
Yes. All
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Thu Sep 20 11:41:25 2012
> New Revision: 1387981
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1387981&view=rev
> Log:
> On 10Gb branch, add a README.
>
> * BRANCH-README: new file
>
> Added:
> subversion/branches/10Gb/BRANCH-READM
On Sep 21, 2012 5:12 AM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
>
> On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> >> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> > According to Paul Burba he
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 12:07 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Please can you document the new parameters here?
>
> r1387875 takes a crack at it.
Thanks, Mike.
- Julian
Ben Reser wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> It's time we stopped saying we're attempting to replace CVS and
> spread a more up-to-date message. So, if no objections, I'll
> commit the attached updates to the FAQ.
>
>+1
r1388731.
- Julian
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:41:33AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Hi, merge fans.
>>
>> I'm trying out UI ideas for making 'svn mergeinfo' with no
> options show some easily digestible summary information about the state of
> merging between the two specified branches.
34 matches
Mail list logo
