Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:21:09PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote: > Currently trunk tries to auto-upgrade the WC pretty much every chance > it gets, even when the cwd is an unversioned directory within a WC. > I've been wondering if this is really such a good idea -- it's been > quite noticeable, in an a

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.08.2012 11:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:21:09PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote: >> Currently trunk tries to auto-upgrade the WC pretty much every chance >> it gets, even when the cwd is an unversioned directory within a WC. >> I've been wondering if this is really such a g

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > After all the discussions about this topic, I've slowly come to the > conclusion that this is the best option. The only trouble I see is in > properly supporting older WC formats, because as far as I can see, > there's not much infrast

Re: Undocumented: ssl-pkcs11-provider - What is a «Security Provider»?

2012-08-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
+= dev@, please drop users@ from replies Marc Wäckerlin wrote on Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:27:14 +0200: > Hi > > I got a proprietary PKCS#11 library (for Post SuisseID smartcard) in > /usr/lib/libcvP11.so. > > There is a configuration option «ssl-pkcs11-provider» in > ~/.subversion/servers. > >

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.08.2012 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >> After all the discussions about this topic, I've slowly come to the >> conclusion that this is the best option. The only trouble I see is in >> properly supporting older WC formats, becaus

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 23:25:54 +0200: > On 25.08.2012 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> After all the discussions about this topic, I've slowly come to the > >> conclusion that this is the best option. The only

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Greg Stein
In the past, we used auto-upgrade because it "just worked". Most users don't need or want to worry about working copy formats. They just want svn to work. I don't think we should be making things more difficult for the majority in order to help a few users who use multiple clients. That is backwar

Re: Auto Upgrade Behavior

2012-08-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 26.08.2012 00:31, Greg Stein wrote: > In the past, we used auto-upgrade because it "just worked". Most users > don't need or want to worry about working copy formats. They just want svn > to work. > > I don't think we should be making things more difficult for the majority in > order to help a f