Bob Chapman wrote on Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 15:00:40 -0500:
> I have used the INSTALL
>
>$ ./configure
>$ make
>$ make install
>
> method to successfully build and install subversion from a tar ball for
> versions from 1.4.x to 1.7.6 on a variety of Centos and Ubuntu
> platforms.
>
> T
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
>
> as you seem to be the only one encountering issue 4174, would you mind
> testing attached serf patch?
> You'll have to update serf trunk to r1627 to apply it cleanly.
>
> It fixes the issue for me on Windows 7 with svn trunk
Chaps,
Not 100% sure where i should do this so apologies if i've done this wrong.
Would it be possible to add the --xml switch to the svnlook functions? This is
only coz i'm a lazy bugger and prefer parsing xml than text.
Regards,
Cedric
]
Sorry, should of said in relation to the info subcommand
Regards,
Cedric
]---[
Mr Cedric Brasey BSc
Managing Director
Tel: (07891) 170784
_
From: Cedric JP. Brasey [mailto:cedric.bra...@planet-side.co.uk]
To: dev@s
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>>
>> as you seem to be the only one encountering issue 4174, would you mind
>> testing attached serf patch?
>> You'll have to update serf trunk to r1627 to apply it
On 08/19/2012 12:21 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 14:01:03 -0400:
>> On 08/17/2012 12:43 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 18:24:03 +0200:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:14:31PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
On 08/17/2012 12:14 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Well, I just ran into my first hurdle: the current svnserve protocol
> demands that capabilities in the standard capabilities string list be of the
> protocol data class "word", which is limited to strings with letters,
> numbers, and hyphens only
On 08/20/2012 10:36 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> [1] mod_dav_svn is an exception here, because the log message is
> PROPPATCHed into the transaction after it's creation. start-commit
> hooks would have to assume that a non-existent log message is simply
> suffering delayed arrival, a
> -Original Message-
> From: cmpil...@apache.org [mailto:cmpil...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 20 augustus 2012 17:19
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1375052 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/auth.c
>
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Mon Aug 20 15:19:06 20
> -Original Message-
> From: lieven.govae...@gmail.com [mailto:lieven.govae...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Lieven Govaerts
> Sent: maandag 20 augustus 2012 12:43
> To: Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development; serf-...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] subversion issue #4174 - serf: ch
On 08/20/2012 11:22 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Your log message says no 'logical changes', while this seems to remove
> the error for unknown password stores?
Doh! Good catch, Bert. Well, as it turns out, I like that change, so I'll
just fix the log message.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <
Daniel -
> Check 'make -n install | grep dontdothat'.
In the 'patched' 1.7.6 version:
$ make -n install | grep dontdothat
$
> (There is a longer answer telling you about . . .
Which I'm probably not smart enough to understand.
It didn't cross my mind to run 'make check' until _after_ m
Bob Chapman wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:32:01 -0500:
> Daniel -
>
> > Check 'make -n install | grep dontdothat'.
>
> In the 'patched' 1.7.6 version:
>
> $ make -n install | grep dontdothat
> $
>
That's the expected/bug-free output.
> > (There is a longer answer telling you about .
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:32:01AM -0500, Bob Chapman wrote:
> On Unbuntu 10.04 LTS, the 87/87 'success' reports looked good but I
> haven't figured out what to make of the subsequent string of 'SKIP' and
> 'X-FAIL' messages or the summary:
These tests are either not applicable to your test setup
> ALSO: I got a private mail response to my previous post on this thread
> which expressed a good deal of excitement regarding the possibility of
> start-commit having access to the revprops (especially svn:log).
That would be very useful. We have transactions that can be 1GB in
size or more and
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: maandag 20 augustus 2012 17:44
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: cmpil...@apache.org; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1375052 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/auth.c
>
> On 08/20/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> . . .
> That's "ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL".
>
> Maybe we should print a one-bit summary like that at the end of the run?
> . . .
Well, can't say but it would have averted my (dumb) question. ;)
Thanks again.
--
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 16:50:11 +0100:
> Bob Chapman wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:32:01 -0500:
> > Daniel -
> >
> > > Check 'make -n install | grep dontdothat'.
> >
> > In the 'patched' 1.7.6 version:
> >
> > $ make -n install | grep dontdothat
> > $
> >
>
> That'
On 08/20/2012 12:00 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I like that change too. Maybe we should backport it to 1.7.x in some way?
Agreed! I'll propose it in a bit if no one beats me to it.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Descript
On 08/20/2012 11:02 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 10:36 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> [1] mod_dav_svn is an exception here, because the log message is
>> PROPPATCHed into the transaction after it's creation. start-commit
>> hooks would have to assume that a non-existent lo
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> Maybe you should call SSL_get_error() in the handler to find out the exact
> reason on why OpenSSL reports the connection as closed?
>
> From man SSL_read on my FreeBSD box:
>
> 0 The read operation was not successful. The reason m
> Now, if we can find a way to expose the revprops to the start-commit hook,
> all three RA layers should be able to provide early detection of commits
> that would fail in pre-commit for revprop-related reasons. (And we should
> consider this independently of the whole client-version capability s
On 08/20/2012 03:38 PM, Mark Moe wrote:
>> Now, if we can find a way to expose the revprops to the start-commit hook,
>> all three RA layers should be able to provide early detection of commits
>> that would fail in pre-commit for revprop-related reasons. (And we should
>> consider this independen
Mark Moe wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 14:38:43 -0500:
> > Now, if we can find a way to expose the revprops to the start-commit hook,
> > all three RA layers should be able to provide early detection of commits
> > that would fail in pre-commit for revprop-related reasons. (And we should
> > consi
[ Nice work indeed, but I'm here only to change the subject to make it
easier to notice. ]
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 15:15:05 -0400:
> On 08/20/2012 11:02 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 08/20/2012 10:36 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> [1] mod_dav_svn is an exception he
25 matches
Mail list logo
