running test-suite over https

2012-08-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Trying to further pin down issue #4174 [1], which only occurs with serf over https (and only on Windows clients I think), I'd like to try running the test-suite over https. Is there any documentation on that? I looked in the community guide, in subversion/tests/README and in subversion/tests/cmdlin

[PATCH] update configure.ac to follow new download location sqlite amalgamation

2012-08-11 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi, seems like the sqlite developers have changed the naming conventions for the sqlite amalgamation distribution package + stopped creating the .tar.gz file. The new address is now: http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amalgamation-3071300.zip instead of: http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amalgamation-3.7.

Re: [PATCH] update configure.ac to follow new download location sqlite amalgamation

2012-08-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Lieven Govaerts wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:15:16 +0200: > Hi, > > > seems like the sqlite developers have changed the naming conventions > for the sqlite amalgamation distribution package + stopped creating > the .tar.gz file. > > The new address is now: > http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-amal

Re: running test-suite over https

2012-08-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:25:02 +0200: > Trying to further pin down issue #4174 [1], which only occurs with > serf over https (and only on Windows clients I think), I'd like to try > running the test-suite over https. Is there any documentation on that? > I looked in the comm

Re: 1.7.6 Candidates

2012-08-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:30:01 -0400: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Philip Martin > wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz writes: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Philip Martin > >> wrote: > >>> Subversion 1.7.6 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by > >>> co

Re: running test-suite over https

2012-08-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:25:02 +0200: >> Trying to further pin down issue #4174 [1], which only occurs with >> serf over https (and only on Windows clients I think), I'd like to try >> running the test-suite over https

Re: running test-suite over https

2012-08-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 22:11:22 +0200: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:25:02 +0200: > >> Trying to further pin down issue #4174 [1], which only occurs with > >> serf over https (and only on Windo

Re: 1.7.6 Candidates

2012-08-11 Thread Mark Phippard
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:30:01 -0400: >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Philip Martin >> wrote: >> > Justin Erenkrantz writes: >> > >> >> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Philip Martin >> >> wrote: >> >>> Subversion

Re: svn commit: r1371282 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/prop_tests.py

2012-08-11 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/10/2012 04:05 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > >>>arglist = [svntest.main.svn_binary, 'propget', SVN_PROP_MERGEINFO, '-vR', >>> - wc_dir] >>> + '--config-dir', svntest.main.default_config_dir, wc_dir] >> >> The user should be able to avoid the F

Re: 1.7.6 Candidates

2012-08-11 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Subversion 1.7.6 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by > committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion +1 Tested on OS X 10.7.4. Dependencies: Neon 0.29.6 Al

Re: 1.7.6 Candidates

2012-08-11 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > But if we still require three +1's from Windows testers and three from > Unix testers does that not take care of it? Paul and I tested and > signed the Windows zip file. Doesn't it make the signatures of the > Unix tar's "better" if we also

Re: 1.7.6 Candidates

2012-08-11 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > The idea is that a hypothetical malicious release manager could create > tar.gz and tar.bz2 correctly but a malicious .zip file. > > We could write a release.py subcommand that compares the > tar.gz/tar.bz2/zip to each other (and to the tag

Re: [PATCH] update configure.ac to follow new download location sqlite amalgamation

2012-08-11 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > Attached patch updates configure to this new location. I can commit > this myself, but I'm wondering if I'm not overlooking something > obvious since this seems to be a strange move from the sqlite devs > side. +1 Looks to me like they've

Build failing on FreeBSD?

2012-08-11 Thread Branko Čibej
Has anyone else noticed that the trunk (and possibly 1.7, haven't tried) build fails on FreeBSD when using sqlite-amalgamation? It looks like the reason lies in build/ac-macros.sqlite.m4, which unconditionally adds -ldl to SVN_SQLITE_LIBS -- and libdl doesn't exist on FreeBSD. I happened to run in