Re: svn commit: r1328595 - /subversion/branches/compressed-pristines/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db .c

2012-04-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
as...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 07:03:52 -: > Author: ashod > Date: Sat Apr 21 07:03:51 2012 > New Revision: 1328595 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328595&view=rev > Log: > Pristine.db created during db-init. > ** Checkpoint: raw code. Not ready for review yet! ** >

Re: svn commit: r1328595 - /subversion/branches/compressed-pristines/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db .c

2012-04-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:13:14 +0300: > As per stsp's earlier review, please do not include unrelated whitespace > changes in commits. Oh, ignore me. I didn't notice that I was reviewing the same commit stsp did. Sorry for the noise.

Re: Merge policies

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Branko Čibej wrote: On 20.04.2012 23:45, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: We could even be more permissive: as long as the merge does not cross "switch boundaries" (switched / non- switched or switched to different URL) as may allow the merge. This could be a somewhat typical use-case for people using sw

Offline this week (4/22 - 4/30)

2012-04-22 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Hey, all. Just a heads-up that I'm offline this week. I'll catch up on mails when I return, of course, but if you mail me with a pressing question and don't get a response ... well, now you know why. -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand

Re: svn commit: r1326688 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/named_atomic-test.c

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Am 16.04.2012 19:45, schrieb Greg Stein: On Apr 16, 2012 1:25 PM, > wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > Date: Mon Apr 16 17:25:18 2012 > New Revision: 1326688 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1326688&view=rev >

Re: svn commit: r1327438 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Am 18.04.2012 18:55, schrieb Greg Stein: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 06:05, wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Apr 18 10:05:56 2012 New Revision: 1327438 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327438&view=rev Log: * subversion/tests/libsvn_subr svn:ignore named_atomic-test-proc binary Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1326688 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/named_atomic-test.c

2012-04-22 Thread Greg Stein
On Apr 22, 2012 2:09 PM, "Stefan Fuhrmann" wrote: > > Am 16.04.2012 19:45, schrieb Greg Stein: >>... >> I also find the need for the has_sufficient_privileges() function to be problematic. It seems to indicate you have not encapsulated this stuff properly. > > Indeed, one might see this as an enca

Re: Offline this week (4/22 - 4/30)

2012-04-22 Thread Greg Stein
I have your cell number. You cannot escape us! On Apr 22, 2012 1:51 PM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote: > Hey, all. Just a heads-up that I'm offline this week. I'll catch up on > mails when I return, of course, but if you mail me with a pressing question > and don't get a response ... well, now you

Re: svn commit: r1327477 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Am 18.04.2012 21:41, schrieb Greg Stein: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:22, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:33:23PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Apr 18 12:33:23 2012 New Revision: 1327477 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327477&view=rev Log: N

Re: svn commit: r1326307 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ build/ac-macros/ subversion/include/ subversion/include/private/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_subr/ subversion/mod_dav_svn/ subversion

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From:stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org] Sent: zondag 15 april 2012 13:21 To:comm...@subversion.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1326307 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ build/ac-macros/ subversion/include/ subversion/include/private/ subversio

Continuing to support older working copy formats

2012-04-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, Wouldn't it be great if svn could keep around code for handling older working copy formats, and for upgrading/downgrading working copies at will between a certain number of formats? Or like danielsh recently suggested during a discussion on users@ [1]: don't make format upgrades mandatory (lik

Re: Continuing to support older working copy formats

2012-04-22 Thread Branko Čibej
On 22.04.2012 21:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > I just wish svn could do the same ... It should be possible to do this by making libsvn_wc a pluggable meta-API, like libsvn_ra. A bit tricky because it has a quasi-public API and wasn't designed to be easily replaced. I think the main reason why this

RE: svn commit: r1328939 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2012-04-22 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 22 april 2012 21:15 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1328939 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c > > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sun Apr 22 19:14:50 2012 > New Re

Re: Continuing to support older working copy formats

2012-04-22 Thread Ashod Nakashian
- Original Message - > From: Johan Corveleyn > To: Subversion Development > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 11:20 PM > Subject: Continuing to support older working copy formats > > Hi, > > Wouldn't it be great if svn could keep around code for handling older > working copy formats,

Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root gets set on checkout)

2012-04-22 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 16:27:00 -0500: >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn

Re: svn commit: r1328998 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_delta_private.h libsvn_delta/compat.c

2012-04-22 Thread Greg Stein
Hyrum, This is effectively your r1231336, but on trunk. The svn_delta_private.h will obviously merge cleanly, but you may have a couple conflicts in compat.c. Then some manual clean-out in svn_delta.h. But after that merge, your branch will be "closer" to trunk. There are some whitespace fixes to

Re: svn commit: r1329015 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_ra_private.h libsvn_ra/editor.c libsvn_ra/ra_loader.c libsvn_ra/ra_loader.h

2012-04-22 Thread Greg Stein
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 20:59, wrote: > Author: gstein > Date: Mon Apr 23 00:59:46 2012 > New Revision: 1329015 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1329015&view=rev > Log: > Provide a first pass at (private) APIs to fetch an EV2-based commit > editor from the RA layers. Some of this is base

[svnbench] Revision: 1329004 compiled Apr 23 2012, 00:21:27

2012-04-22 Thread neels
/home/neels/svnbench/20120423-002445 Started at Mon Apr 23 00:24:45 UTC 2012 *Disclaimer:* this tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM. This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working copy layer, *only*. These results are *not* generally true for everyone. Average

Re: svn commit: r1328939 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2012-04-22 Thread Blair Zajac
On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:14 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Apr 22 19:14:50 2012 New Revision: 1328939 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328939&view=rev Log: * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (svn_io_lock_open_file, svn_io_unlock_open_file): fix handling of APR errors

Re: svn commit: r1328939 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2012-04-22 Thread Blair Zajac
On 4/22/12 11:52 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:14 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Apr 22 19:14:50 2012 New Revision: 1328939 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328939&view=rev Log: * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (svn_io_lock_open_file, svn_io_unlock_o

Re: Failing test basic_tests.py 29 (check that repos root gets set on checkout)

2012-04-22 Thread Branko Čibej
On 23.04.2012 00:00, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 16:27:00 -0500: >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >