On 20-10-2011 19:31, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:29:10PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
This one should really fix it in all cases.
The 3rd one also wasn't perfect.
I've committed a proper patch in r1186944 and nominated the fix
for backport to 1.7.x. Thanks for your report
Paul Burba wrote:
> No, we can trim that first block. I did that along with some
> additional simplifications in r1187042.
Thanks, Paul. Looks nice now.
Sorry, Bert, for causing confusing in the email thread by not quoting
enough context.
- Julian
Hi,
I have installed the latest version 1.7.0 and I have done the SVN upgrade
option to my specific repository. I have used asphack option to retain my
_svn folders.
On a specific repository when I click on svn cleanup I get the following
error. I have installed the latest nightly build an
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:15:02AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The tarballs for Subversion 1.7.1 are up for testing, the magic rev is
> r1186859:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.1/
>
> Please submit your signatures in the usual way:
> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sig
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:19:08PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
> on solaris, one test is failing for 1.7.0 ...
> At least one test FAILED, checking /home/rupert/mgar-sav/pkg/
> subversion/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/
> subversion-1.7.0/tests.log
> FAIL: copy_tests.py 86: changed d
Hello,
after upgrading the svn 1.7 I realized an issue.
When I add an empty UTF-8 file, it is added with mimetype
application/octet-stream
The empty UTF8 file has 3 bytes size - there are just the 3 mark bytes
0xEF 0xBB 0xBF
If there is an content in that file, it is handled correctly like t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:15:19AM +0200, Tomáš Bihary wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after upgrading the svn 1.7 I realized an issue.
>
> When I add an empty UTF-8 file, it is added with mimetype
> application/octet-stream
> The empty UTF8 file has 3 bytes size - there are just the 3 mark
> bytes 0xEF 0xBB
What do you expect to happen?
As to special-casing svn_io_is_binary_data() to handle 0xEFBBBF
correctly... we could do that, I suppose.
Tomáš Bihary wrote on Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:15:19 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> after upgrading the svn 1.7 I realized an issue.
>
> When I add an empty UTF-8 file, it
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: vrijdag 21 oktober 2011 13:13
> To: Tomáš Bihary
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: problems with mimetype of and empty utf8 files in svn 1.7
>
> What do you expect to happen?
>
> As to speci
Hi,
Yes you are right, SVN 1.6.16 doest it as well, so it's not a 1.7 new issue.
There is just different behaviour for such file in the TortioseSVN Comit
Dialog, so I didn't realized it before
- 1.6 does not display any property status - you have to take a look on
the properties and there is t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> > Sent: vrijdag 21 oktober 2011 13:13
> > To: Tomáš Bihary
> > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: problems with mimetype of and e
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 13:27:28 +0200:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> > > Sent: vrijdag 21 oktober 2011 13:13
> > > To: Tomáš Bihary
> > >
To be honest, I expect that a C# source code will be handled as a text file.
Even if it is empty at the point of the ADD operation.
The backgound is that this happens in combination VS2008/2010 -
Resharper - VisualSVN - TortioseSVN.
If you do in Resharper the rectoring "Move the class to new f
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, 'Daniel Shahaf' wrote:
> Have you considered patchign svn_io_is_binary_data()?
>
> (which, it appears, will be functionally equivalent to your current
> patch)
Yeah, makes sense. Do that if you prefer.
(regarding Bert's patch problem: looks like a bug to
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/squeeze)
Tested:
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS
Local dependencies:
apache2-threaded-dev
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:15, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The tarballs for Subversion 1.7.1 are up for testing, the magic rev is
> r1186859:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.1/
>
> Please submit your signatures in the usual way:
> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
>
SUMM
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> hwri...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:40:04 -:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Fri Oct 21 01:40:03 2011
>> New Revision: 1187160
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187160&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Ev2 shims: Allow callers to
--- Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The tarballs for Subversion 1.7.1 are
> up for testing, the magic rev is r1186859 [...]
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix).
My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.
Tested:
[ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]
swig-py
Thanks everybody for the quick turnaround on the signatures; I've put
the tarballs up for mirroring, and hope to publish the release
tomorrow.
-Hyrum
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> The tarballs for Subversion 1.7.1 are up for testing, the magic rev is
> r1186859:
> ht
19 matches
Mail list logo
