Stéphane Gaudreault writes:
> Here is a patch that fix compilation of the perl bindings on i686 :
Is the compilation failing? I think the compilation works, the problem
is the bindings fail at runtime.
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24540
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> Sent: maandag 4 juli 2011 19:34
> To: Philip Martin
> Cc: Bert Huijben; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Third (and probably last) alpha coming later this week
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Philip Ma
Attached is the fails.log file for the tests that I ran using the
following command.
make check SERVER_MINOR_VERSION=5
I hope this will be useful to figure whether we need to fix those
tests.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
fails.log.svn_minor_version_5.txt.gz
Description: Binary data
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Attached is the fails.log and tests.log files for the tests that I ran
> using the following command.
>
Actually only fails.log file is attached. I think that is sufficient.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
Attached is the fails.log file for the tests that I ran using the
following command.
make check SERVER_MINOR_VERSION=6
I hope this will be useful to figure whether we need to fix those
tests.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
fails.log.svn_minor_version_6.txt.gz
Description: Binary data
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 17:03:34 +0530:
>
> Attached is the fails.log file for the tests that I ran using the
> following command.
>
> make check SERVER_MINOR_VERSION=5
>
> I hope this will be useful to figure whether we need to fix those
> tests.
>
> Thanks and Regards
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2011 10:18 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2011 1:34 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Philip Martin
>> > wrote:
>> > > "Bert Huijben" writes:
>> > >
>> > >> The issue Ivan Zhakov i
Obviously there is a syntax error in the test. At a closer read, there
is also a semantic error in the PASSES_WITHOUT_BPV() helper's code for
old servers.
I'll add it to my list. Not a critical release blocker, but it'd be
nice for the unit test not to fail spuriously.
Noorul Islam K M wrote
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 15:49:09 +0300:
> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 17:03:34 +0530:
> > FAIL: svnadmin_tests.py 23: svnadmin verify with non-UTF-8 paths
>
> This tests for a feature added less than a month ago, ie, expected
> failure.
r1143037
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> We want to ship the best product possible. This mailing list is defined to
>> be our decision-making focus. It seems incorrect to disregard a reported
>> problem simply because (for whatever reason) an issue is not in the tracker.
>
> I don
Mark Phippard writes:
> Anyway, from what I see this still has not been entered in the issue
> tracker. Also, if Bert seems to have a fix for the problem why are we
> not just putting that in place? I do not get the "waiting for Ivan"
> part. Is there anything blocking Ivan from making the fix
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Mark Phippard writes:
>
>> Anyway, from what I see this still has not been entered in the issue
>> tracker. Also, if Bert seems to have a fix for the problem why are we
>> not just putting that in place? I do not get the "waiting for Ivan"
Mark Phippard writes:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> If I enable both Bert's code and Ivan's reverted change the regression
>> tests PASS.
>
> Yes, Bert said as much. The issue was that Ivan asked him not to
> commit until he examined the problem in more detail.
On 07/05/2011 09:57 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> BTW, Bert, Ivan indicated the Neon problem happens if you add the
> directive "SVNAllowBulkUpdates off" to the server. This makes Neon
> behave like Serf in terms of doing a GET for each file.
... and I looks like Philip filed an issue for exactly th
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:47:22 +0530:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > At least this needs cross-referencing comments to svntest/main.py which
> > does the same check.
> >
>
> I agree. Please find attached updated patch.
>
> > I don't know (and haven't looked) whether it's
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:37 PM, "danie...@apache.org" wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Tue Jul 5 15:06:25 2011
> New Revision: 1143092
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1143092&view=rev
> Log:
> * build/run_tests.py
> (TestHarness.__init__): Restrict --server-minor-version to take value
r1143103, thanks. (And also thanks to Bert for drawing my attention to it.)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 09:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
>>> We want to ship the best product possible. This mailing list is defined to
>>> be our decision-making focus. It seems incorrect to disregard a reported
>>> problem simply because (for
Greg Stein writes:
> An issue has been filed now, for all the issue-oriented people. Done.
> Process works.
No, it has not. I filed issue 3946, but that's not the problem that
Bert first mentioned. I suppose I could put Bert's second email into an
issue, but I don't really understand the probl
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 5 juli 2011 20:15
> To: Mark Phippard
> Cc: Hyrum K Wright; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Third (and probably last) alpha coming later this week
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 09:44, Mark Phippard wro
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 09:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Hyrum K Wright
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> We want to ship the best product possible. This mailing list is defined to
> >>> be our decision-making focus. It seem
Le 5 juillet 2011 04:24:11, Philip Martin a écrit :
> Stéphane Gaudreault writes:
> > Here is a patch that fix compilation of the perl bindings on i686 :
> Is the compilation failing? I think the compilation works, the problem
> is the bindings fail at runtime.
>
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/t
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:27:51PM -0400, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Compilation is not failing. The bindings fail at runtime on i686, but works
> on
> x86_64.
>
> Here are the perl and subversion cflags on i686 :
>
> subversion: -march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -pthread -
> D_LARGEFILE
Stefan Sperling writes:
> This pretty much confirms the suspicion that this is a packaging
> problem, as discussed here:
> http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-06/0261.shtml
>
> Please fix the packaging of Perl and Subversion in Arch Linux.
> Other affected distributions should do the same.
Sub
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:01, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> We're almost ready to branch 1.7.x, and there remains the business of
> cleaning up the database schema from columns introduced in the 1.7
> development cycle. This has historically be labelled 'format 99', and
> is found at the bottom of wc-
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 17:55, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>...
>> I agree with Daniel's suggestion to add a "with_lock" function that
>> invokes a callback with the mutex held. That is probably the safest
>> way to use the mutexes, and it will always guarantee they are unlocked
>> (eg. in the face of a
Mark,
As you are a primary consumer of the JavaHL API, would you mind
looking it over so we can fix any remaining issues before the 1.7.x
branch? I realize it's been stable for the past little while, but
some positive confirmation that things look good would make me a feel
a bit better. A lot has
Le 5 juillet 2011 15:51:58, Philip Martin a écrit :
> Stefan Sperling writes:
> > This pretty much confirms the suspicion that this is a packaging
> > problem, as discussed here:
> > http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-06/0261.shtml
> >
> > Please fix the packaging of Perl and Subversion in Arc
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:01, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> We're almost ready to branch 1.7.x, and there remains the business of
>> cleaning up the database schema from columns introduced in the 1.7
>> development cycle. This has historically be l
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 17:47, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>...
> Greg, in r879400 you added the following comment to wc-metadata.sql:
>
> /* Format 99 drops all columns not needed due to previous format upgrades.
> Before we release 1.7, these statements will be pulled into a format bump
> and all t
30 matches
Mail list logo
