On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find some files it wants
such as /usr/lib/crti.o. Maybe you are missing a package?
On Debian this file seems to be in the libc6-dev package.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:21:15PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:40:16PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
> wrote:
> > I suggest to use:
> > AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
> > AC_PATH_PROG(RDOC, $RDOC rdoc, none)
> Yes, that sounds like a good solution
s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
Could you re-add ruby1.8? I added it because in some environment I had
no 'ruby' binary but did have a 'ruby1.8' binary...
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> > +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
>
> Could you re-add ruby1.8? I added it because in some environment I had
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8 ruby18 ruby, none)
> > > +AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby, none)
> >
>
[Mark Phippard]
> Would this cause issues for apps that drive the command line
> programmatically without a console? For example, a Java web app that
> does some SVN commands from within the app server?
I can't imagine we'd want to officially support that sort of usage.
We've broken "screen scra
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 05:57:26PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:11:02 -:
> > > > -AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, ruby1.8
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:07:35 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 05:57:26PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 16:21:53 +0200:
> > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > s...@apache.org wrote on Sun,
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> is too much of a problem. We already do this for some other
> dependencies:
OK, then let's make it do what Arfrever suggested:
AC_PATH_PROGS(RUBY, $RUBY ruby
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:43:22 +0200:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> > is too much of a problem. We already do this for some other
> > dependencies:
>
> OK, then
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
>> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
>
> Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find some files it wants
> such as /usr/lib/crti.o. Maybe you are m
Senthil Kumaran S wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 21:23:34 +0530:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> >> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
> >
> > Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I have:
> * Debian stable
> * libc6-dev 2.11.2-10
> * /usr/lib/crti.o is reported (dpkg -S) to be owned by libc6-dev
I could see the above file,
$ ls /usr/lib/crti.o -alh
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1012 Jan 24 05:40 /usr/lib/crti.o
But for so
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 18:50:59 +0300:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 17:43:22 +0200:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 06:15:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > I don't think checking for ruby20 ruby2.0 ruby19 ruby1.9 ruby18 ruby1.8
> > > is too much of a problem
externals_tests.py 29 'update a file external without committing
target' is still marked as XFail, but the issue mentioned there (#3823
- 'update' update file external without commit is broken) is marked as
Fixed.
What's going on? Is the @Issue annotation wrong in externals_tests.py?
Or is the iss
One of my after-hours activities is to help maintain a community
hosting site for Common Lisp development.
During our latest system migration, I noticed that mod_dav_svn acts
weird in view of symlinks:
If you check http://svn.common-lisp.net/, the repository listing page
is empty. However, if you
SWIG is not required for building of SWIG-based bindings from release tarballs,
which contain
some SWIG-generated files. `configure` prints a warning, when a version of SWIG
newer than
hardcoded maximal version is detected. The maximal version very often becomes
outdated (e.g.
currently 2.0.4 is
[Peter Samuelson]
> I'd say, if you don't have an actual console at hand, you really
> really should be using --non-interactive.
Alternatively, I considered doing this same thing, but falling back to
stdin / stderr if the console cannot be opened. apr_password_get()
seems to use them if there is
[Peter Samuelson]
> I _am_ rather curious whether, on Windows, using "CON:" for prompting
> actually allows stdin to be usable for other things. Like, when
> piping or redirecting to it. I suppose I can try to test this
> feature using MingW32 + Wine
Hmmm, fopen("CON:", "r+") in mingw32 + Wine
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:pe...@p12n.org]
> Sent: zondag 5 juni 2011 22:22
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Use console, not stdin/stderr, for prompting
>
>
> [Peter Samuelson]
> > I _am_ rather curious whether, on Windows, using "C
2011/6/5 Peter Samuelson :
>
> [Peter Samuelson]
>> I _am_ rather curious whether, on Windows, using "CON:" for prompting
>> actually allows stdin to be usable for other things. Like, when
>> piping or redirecting to it. I suppose I can try to test this
>> feature using MingW32 + Wine
>
> Hmmm, f
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:41 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 01:20 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>> Looking at the package page: http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html,
>> the word "professional" bugs me, because I help out on the MacPorts'
>> support and it's not like we're not "software d
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Morten Kloster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> ...
> []
>> I'll get into some more testing and reviewing tomorrow or the day
>> after (unless someone else beats me to it
/home/neels/svnbench/20110606-002335
Started at Mon Jun 6 00:23:35 UTC 2011
-
Results for dir levels: 5 spread: 5
Timings for 5x5_1.6
N min max avgoperation (unit is seconds)
6 594.63 613.97 606.98 T
24 matches
Mail list logo
