> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Haesen [mailto:marc.hae...@oneaccess-net.com]
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 8:11
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn up problem using latest trunk revision (1092011)
>
> I am using the latest version of svn on trunk compiled for windows. Whe
Yes, I started from an empty directory. On the initial checkout I get
revision 5538
I have the same problem on a linux version (1091675) compiled on debian.
Here is the complete output:
mahae@linux-nagios:~/temp$ svn co
http://tinyos-main.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/tos/chips/atm128/spi .
AAtm12
> -Original Message-
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 9:19
> To: 'Marc Haesen'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: svn up problem using latest trunk revision (1092011)
> This patch would only affect the error:
>
> if (recorded_base_che
Indeed, r1092033 fixes the problem to.
Thanks,
Marc
-Original Message-
From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 9:49
To: Marc Haesen; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn up problem using latest trunk revision (1092011)
> -Original Message
Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 03:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pila
On 04/14/2011 04:17 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Thu Apr 14 08:17:40 2011
> New Revision: 1092047
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092047&view=rev
> Log:
> Allow running davautocheck with HTTPv2 disabled.
I *think* you could probably have done this already b
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:59 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 04:17 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092047&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Allow running davautocheck with HTTPv2 disabled.
>
> I *think* you could probably have done this already by set
Hi all,
yesterday's and today's benchmarks look particularly good (listed
below). I haven't paid attention to commits, but it seems some pretty
good perf commits have happened recently (except for 'svn delete').
'svn delete' is still 10 times slower on trunk for 100x1 (in a deep
working copy of 1
On 04/14/2011 09:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:59 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
> wrote:
>> On 04/14/2011 04:17 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092047&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Allow running davautocheck with HTTPv2 disabled.
>>
>> I *thin
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:38 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 09:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:59 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
> > wrote:
> >> On 04/14/2011 04:17 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092047&view=rev
> >
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Apr 13 21:47:24 2011
> New Revision: 1091928
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091928&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix issue #2381: "Cannot commit multiple WC paths which lack a common parent
> directory" by making the commit pr
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:19 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Blair Zajac wrote:
>> On 04/13/2011 03:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote:
On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
>
All of them: add, remove and change.
Just check something like the merge support over 1.6.X.
Bert Huijben (Cell phone) From: Blair Zajac
Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 18:06
To: Julian Foad
Cc: Branko Čibej; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.7 Roadmap Items Evaluation
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2
I just built a version of trunk to use on my "production" working
copies, and configured it without maintainer mode. I noticed that it
was using '-g -O2' in the CFLAGS, which seems completely nonsensical:
debug symbols often refer to stuff that gets optimized away, and just
bloats the final execut
On 04/13/2011 10:55 PM, Gavin "Beau" Baumanis wrote:
> If the information is appropriately stored in the repository, and can be
> resolved somewhat via doing svn log / text searches; Why can't a
> function ; getTheLastRevisionAndPathThisFileExisted(filename,
> repo://startingPath); be created? tha
On 04/14/2011 11:47 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM, wrote:
>> Author: rhuijben
>> Date: Wed Apr 13 21:47:24 2011
>> New Revision: 1091928
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091928&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix issue #2381: "Cannot commit multiple WC paths which la
Sometime last week, the ruby bindings started failing. It happened
after one of my commits to the changelist code, but I've reason to
believe that's not the correct culprit. Something is happening in the
set up of the test harness, and all of the errors are of the form:
[[[
164) Error:
test_wc(S
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 17:47
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: rhuij...@apache.org; comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091928 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_client/
In upgrading an old working copy to the 1.7 format, I noticed a full
stop in the message "Upgraded 'subversion/svn'.". It it grammatically
correct, but feels a bit extraneous.
In looking through subversion/svn/notify.c, I noticed we do use the
full stop in a number of places, but in lots of place
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 14 april 2011 17:47
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Cc: rhuij...@apache.org; comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commi
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> I just built a version of trunk to use on my "production" working
> copies, and configured it without maintainer mode. I noticed that it
> was using '-g -O2' in the CFLAGS, which seems completely nonsensical:
> debug symbols often refer to stuff that gets optimized away,
On 04/14/2011 02:08 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Oh, and I also coded up the original implementation of issue #3242. (Not
> the> fix, the implementation)
Heheh.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 14:25 -0400, Philip Martin wrote:
> I believe it is a GNU standard. Debug symbols can be used with an
> optimised build although it is obviously easier to debug without
> optimisation
More specifically: stepping through a -g -O2 executable is pretty
painful, but you can stil
Philip Martin writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> Although I don't know if this has any impact on the processor
>> i-cache
On a Linux system the debug symbols are in separate ELF sections, the
loader probaby doesn't even map them into memory.
--
Philip
On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
> very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
> and friends is no longer appropriate. The same goes for the
> place that this has been implemented.
>
> From a design perspective
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
> > very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
> > and friends is no longer appropriate. The same goes for the
[Hyrum K Wright]
> Although I don't know if this has any impact on the processor
> i-cache, I still don't see much reason for using '-g -O2' in
> non-maintainer mode.
As others have said, no, it should have no effect on the icache, at
least on systems I know (mainly ELF). The debug section isn't
On 04/14/2011 03:30 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Apr 14 19:30:04 2011
> New Revision: 1092446
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1092446&view=rev
> Log:
> UI tweak: Use ':' in place of '...' in the update start notification.
>
> This is a bit of a bikeshed, b
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 18:03
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091187 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/svn_wc.h libsvn_client/switch
On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
> wrote:
>> On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
>>> very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
>>> and friends i
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> yesterday's and today's benchmarks look particularly good (listed
> below). I haven't paid attention to commits, but it seems some pretty
> good perf commits have happened recently (except for 'svn delete').
> All in all, once w
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Some thoughts:
>>>
>>> - There is only a problem if the dst_path gets case-normalized to one
>>> of the source paths.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 18:19, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>...
>>> Yes, but the statement itself can be attacked if you manually build it. With
>>> static text, that is not possible. Attackers cannot alter the semantics in
>>> any way.
>>
>> I gues
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 18:04, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c Thu Apr 14 22:04:55 2011
> @@ -2370,28 +2370,30 @@ svn_wc_get_status_editor5(const svn_delt
>...
> +svn_wc__internal_walk_status(svn_wc__db_t *db,
> + const char *local_absp
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 15 april 2011 0:25
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1092530 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: status.c update_editor.c wc.h
> > - SVN_ERR(svn_wc__internal_walk_child
On Apr 14, 2011 6:35 PM, "Bert Huijben" wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: vrijdag 15 april 2011 0:25
> > To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1092530 - in
> > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: status.c
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 23:22 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi Neels,
>
> Great work, and good to see those numbers. But ... hold on a minute
> before jumping to conclusions. IIUC you only tested one type of
> platform: *nix with local disk (on a (powerful) VM, and on a (slightly
> less powerful)
Awesome, thanks Mike.
I'll certainly have a play and see what I can achieve...
On 15/04/2011, at 3:07 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 10:55 PM, Gavin "Beau" Baumanis wrote:
>> If the information is appropriately stored in the repository, and can be
>> resolved somewhat via doing sv
I've been looking at the GSoC proposals for Apache, and there doesn't
seem to be one for Subversion. There was one about making the test suite
run in production, but it's gone now.
Are we quit of that chore for this season then? ;)
-- Brane
Hi Neels,
I have a brand new (2 week old) MacBook Pro with 4 GB RAM.
I am more than happy to run your scripts if you like.
On the same machine I have 1.6.16 (and trunk r1092145) installed - so I can do
a comparison run of both.
And if you think it is worthy of another comparison run, I have a 3
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:42, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
>...
> Any ideas/opinions about adding to tools/dev/ would be appreciated.
Commited in r1092569 as tools/dev/benchmarks/suite1. Having them in
source control is better than worrying too much about the naming.
We can now evolve these for other pl
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:25 +0200, "Neels Hofmeyr" wrote:
> So, does anyone do Windows? Do you speak bash, python and BAT? Want to
> know about perf on your setup? I'll gladly send you my scripts
Just add them to public version control?
> and explain anything you want to know about it.
42 matches
Mail list logo
