Re: [Issue 3815] New - incremental hotcopy, fsfs-only

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
phi...@tigris.org wrote on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:16:29 -0800: > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3815 > Issue #|3815 > Summary|incremental hotcopy, fsfs-only >Component|subversion > Version|--- >

Re: svn commit: r1071330 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x: ./ subversion/tests/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 17:58:00 -: > Author: hwright > Date: Wed Feb 16 17:58:00 2011 > New Revision: 1071330 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071330&view=rev > Log: > Merge r1051744, r1051745, r1053185, r1053241 from trunk, using the > instructions > inclu

Re: svn commit: r1071602 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: svn/blame-cmd.c tests/cmdline/blame_tests.py

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 13:15:14 -: > Author: stsp > Date: Thu Feb 17 13:15:13 2011 > New Revision: 1071602 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071602&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/svn/blame-cmd.c > (svn_cl__blame): If one of the targets is a non-existent URL or

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > Why can't you svnsync the master to the hotcopy using file:// URLs? > (and create the svn:sync-* props before / remove them after, if that's > a problem) That's one option. svnsync is probably less efficient in terms of disk IO. At the moment svnsync doesn't do exclusiv

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 09:43:49 +: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > > Why can't you svnsync the master to the hotcopy using file:// URLs? > > (and create the svn:sync-* props before / remove them after, if that's > > a problem) > > That's one option. svnsync is probably less

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:45:54 +0200: > (For example, WebDAV mirrors also suffer from both of these problems) Oops; I already said that in another mail. Sorry for the duplication.

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > Philip Martin wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 09:43:49 +: >> At the moment svnsync doesn't do exclusive file locks or old >> revprops that have changed. svnsync is unlikely to ever update old >> revprops automatically, it is likely that it will always need some >> exter

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > Daniel Shahaf writes: >> >> Either method would need to account for old-revprop changes and for 'svn >> lock' locks. > > Unless we start recording some sort of history for revprops the only > option for svnsync is to resend all revprops, hotcopy has more options. As you

Re: svnadmin hotcopy --incremental

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:30:17 +: > Philip Martin writes: > > > Daniel Shahaf writes: > >> > >> Either method would need to account for old-revprop changes and for 'svn > >> lock' locks. > > > > Unless we start recording some sort of history for revprops the only > > op

Re: svn commit: r1072302 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/include/private/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_subr/ subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/

2011-02-19 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 13:47, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Feb 19 10:47:16 2011 > New Revision: 1072302 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072302&view=rev > Log: > Merge all changes (r1068724, r1068739) from the > integrate-cache-item-serialization branch. > > These patches intro

Re: svn commit: r1071330 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x: ./ subversion/tests/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/

2011-02-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:56:55AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > hwri...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 17:58:00 -: > > Author: hwright > > Date: Wed Feb 16 17:58:00 2011 > > New Revision: 1071330 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1071330&view=rev > > Log: > > Merge r1051

Re: svn commit: r1071330 - in /subversion/branches/1.6.x: ./ subversion/tests/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_base/

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:49:45 +0100: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:56:55AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > hwri...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 17:58:00 -: > > > Author: hwright > > > Date: Wed Feb 16 17:58:00 2011 > > > New Revision: 1071330 > > > > > > URL

svn: E200009: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[[[ % cd tools/client-side/ % touch foo % $svn add * -q svn: E29: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist % ]]] The error message is wrong: the /real/ problem is that some targets are already versioned, not that I did 'svn add fou'.

Re: svn: E200009: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist

2011-02-19 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Daniel Shahaf writes: > [[[ > % cd tools/client-side/ > % touch foo > % $svn add * -q > svn: E29: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist > % > ]]] > > The error message is wrong: the /real/ problem is that some targets > are already versioned, not that I did 'svn add fou'

Re: svn: E200009: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 20:12:55 +0530: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > > [[[ > > % cd tools/client-side/ > > % touch foo > > % $svn add * -q > > svn: E29: Could not add all targets because some targets don't exist > > % > > ]]] > > > > The error message is wrong: the /rea

Why svn_client_update3() always return success?

2011-02-19 Thread Grigory Petrov
Hello. I'm learning a Subversion API right now and have following test code: http://pastebin.com/rVQM7TpJ The svn_client_ls() call correctly returns error code since i give a wrong repository URL. But next call to svn_client_update3() ALWAYS returns success (zero) regardless of arguments i supp

Re: Why svn_client_update3() always return success?

2011-02-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Please use paragraphs. Grigory Petrov wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 18:08:36 +0300: > Hello. > > I'm learning a Subversion API right now and have following test code: > http://pastebin.com/rVQM7TpJ > The svn_client_ls() call correctly returns error code since i give a > wrong repository URL. But

[PATCH] Re: svn commit: r1071809 - in /subversion/trunk: build/run_tests.py subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py win-tests.py

2011-02-19 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Paul Burba writes: > If someone with the requisite linux skills/hardware could tweak > makefile.in so it can take advantage of the --milestone-filter option, > well that would be fabulous. > > Paul > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:09 PM, wrote: >> Author: pburba >> Date: Thu Feb 17 22:09:02 2011 >

Re: Why svn_client_update3() always return success?

2011-02-19 Thread Grigory Petrov
When ./ is a working copy, 'svn up nonexistentpath' returns zero because, if that path had been added between BASE and HEAD, it would create that file in the wc. Outside a working copy it should signal an error. (currently outside of a working copy it generates a "Skip" notification) I have co

Re: svn commit: r1069961 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_diff.h libsvn_diff/diff.c libsvn_diff/diff.h libsvn_diff/diff3.c libsvn_diff/diff4.c libsvn_diff/diff_file.c libsvn_diff/diff_me

2011-02-19 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 00:38, wrote: > Author: jcorvel > Date: Fri Feb 11 21:38:55 2011 > New Revision: 1069961 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069961&view=rev > Log: > Re-enable elimination of the identical suffix for diff (and diff3 (merge) and > diff4), which was disabled in r10686

Re: svn commit: r1072282 - in /subversion/branches/integrate-compression-level/subversion: include/svn_delta.h libsvn_delta/svndiff.c svnserve/main.c svnserve/server.h

2011-02-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Feb 19 09:31:01 2011 > New Revision: 1072282 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072282&view=rev > Log: > Public definitions should be prefixed by SVN_. Thus, rename the default > compression level and introduce boundar

Re: svn commit: r1069961 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_diff.h libsvn_diff/diff.c libsvn_diff/diff.h libsvn_diff/diff3.c libsvn_diff/diff4.c libsvn_diff/diff_file.c libsvn_diff/diff_me

2011-02-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 00:38,   wrote: >> Author: jcorvel >> Date: Fri Feb 11 21:38:55 2011 >> New Revision: 1069961 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069961&view=rev >> Log: >> Re-enable elimination of the identical suffix for diff