Hi,
For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in
my installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web
and reading up even on the internals of the service I found that there
just i
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:42, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
> indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in my
> installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web and
> reading up even o
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zondag 6 februari 2011 10:43
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: mark .svn folders to not get indexed
>
> Hi,
>
> For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
> indexing service
Ping. This patch has received no new comments.
On 08/01/2011, at 5:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I'll add it to my list, but as I'll have to read the whole thing before
> answering it might take a while until I'll answer.
>
> If anyone else wants to beat me to it...
>
>
> Erik Johansson wrot
Ping. This patch is yet to receive any new comments.
It seems that David has already attached the patches to issue #3588
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 09/12/2010, at 11:23 PM, David Burley wrote:
> They got mangled on the way to my mail client -- I tested them again locally
> before attaching the
Ping. This patch submission is yet to receive any new comments.
On 26/01/2011, at 3:29 AM, Danny Trebbien wrote:
>> Hi Danny.
>>
>> I committed the patch you refer to, on which this one depends, in
>> r1063320. However, I'm not likely to get around to reviewing this patch
>> any time soon. It
On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote:
Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8,
nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to
support both when we don't want to introduce a regression.
Yes, of course.
How about adding this to dir_mak
On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote:
Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8,
nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to
support both when we don't want to introduce a regression.
In 1.7 we usually only have one .svn directory per
+1, this is a great idea.
On 06.02.2011 10:42, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
> indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in
> my installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web
> and
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:30:16PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Feb 6 14:30:16 2011
> New Revision: 1067675
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067675&view=rev
> Log:
> Add cache configuration parameter SVNInMemoryCacheSize to mod_dav_svn.
> Now, the in-m
On 06.02.2011 18:32, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:30:16PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Feb 6 14:30:16 2011
New Revision: 1067675
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067675&view=rev
Log:
Add cache configuration parameter SVNInMemoryCacheSize
Hi Johan,
I just finished the review of the changes on your branch.
Except for a few minor hints, everything looks fine and
should be merged to /trunk. The two findings can be
addressed on /trunk directly.
-- Stefan^2.
Index: BRANCH-README
==
On 28.01.2011 05:27, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi @all,
I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th.
Speak now or forever hold your peace.
Rationale:
I've been testing / usi
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Merge is done and everything got adapted
> to support both server types equally. The new
> caching code is active by default.
>
> BTW, how / where do we document things like
> the new mod_dav_svn module parameter?
I was going to ask if you
Hi, back with another svn question regardling branches. Beat my head against
this wall for a while and figured someone here would know.
I've been trying to go about doing branch imports a somewhat strange, to svn
it appears, way. I run a checkout like so:
svn co -r1 file:ssd1/lm/tcl-subset.
Hi Larry,
This mailing list is for the discussion of developing Subversion.
Your question would get a armer response if you posted to;
us...@subversion.apache.org
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 07/02/2011, at 8:54 AM, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Hi, back with another svn question regardling branches. Bea
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> I just finished the review of the changes on your branch.
> Except for a few minor hints, everything looks fine and
> should be merged to /trunk. The two findings can be
> addressed on /trunk directly.
Thanks. Reintegrated it
Stefan,
[[[
% make -s
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1223: warning:
‘svn_membuffer_cache_get_partial’ defined but not used
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1250: warning:
‘svn_membuffer_cache_is_cachable’ defined but not used
% grep -R svn_membuffer_cache_is_cachable subversion
I managed to cause 'svn' to lose my commit message when (for whatever
reason) Vim exited with error code 2 after I'd saved the file:
[[[
subversion/svn/commit-cmd.c:154: (apr_err=200012)
subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c:845: (apr_err=200012)
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
subversion/svn/util
On 05.02.2011 21:55, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
I would not worry about existing clients -- simply mark the existin
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:24 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:21 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > I'm submitting this patch as a "am I on the right track?" submission,
> rather
> > than a final job. I'll craft a log message if I'm correct.
>
> Heh, I remember when this special-case wa
On Saturday 05 February 2011 01:46 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
...
We currently mark tests XFail (or Skip, or something else) by wrapping
them
Arwin Arni writes:
> On Saturday 05 February 2011 01:46 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> ...
> We currently mark tests XFai
23 matches
Mail list logo
