Hyrum K Wright writes:
> I've been looking at which bugs can be closed by the pending
> completion of wc-ng. In particular, I've been looking at issue #1284:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1284
>
> The issue is essentially a complaint about the performance of 'svn mv
> som
Hi,
As the guy responsible for the quote that started this thread ([1]):
> Actually, what's a little bit troubling is that there are currently
> only 3 possible "file_len's", of which only 2 are used in practice:
> diff2 and diff3 (diff4 is not used in svn core, only in
> tools/diff/diff4). So, i
Julian Foad writes:
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:50 +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Stefan Sperling writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:31:11PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> >
>> >> | Command| Return Code | Continue |
>> >> |+-+--|
>> >> | add
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
[ ... snip ... ]
>> But I think, the stack variable is certainly helpful
>> and easy to do.
Ok, I've done this (locally, still have to clean up a little and then
commit). It gives
* Blair Zajac:
> Attempting to perform high commit rates into an fsfs repository on NFS
> with two or more Linux boxes, one of the processes can get stuck in
> fcntl() for over 30 seconds:
>
> open("repo/db/write-lock", O_RDWR) = 4
> fcntl(4, F_SETLKW, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0,
Can anyone spare a bit of time to take this forward? I'll tell you what
I'm planning to do next. Maybe someone can get to this before I can.
The first thing I want to do is add a DB index on the 'refcount' column
of the 'pristine' table. I'm convinced that will be necessary for
adequate perform
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Blair Zajac:
>
>> Attempting to perform high commit rates into an fsfs repository on NFS
>> with two or more Linux boxes, one of the processes can get stuck in
>> fcntl() for over 30 seconds:
>>
>> open("repo/db/write-lock", O_RDWR) =
Daniel Becroft wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:13:12 +1000:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was looking through the "Getting Involved" section of the Subversion
> website, and decided to start by writing a regression test for an
> issue, starting with 3686 (executable flag not correctly set on
> merge). This is
On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:49 AM, Bolstridge, Andrew wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Just a quick question/suggestion:
>
> If the exponential sleep can be a maximum of 25ms, and the random one
> between 0 and 100ms, what is the performance like if you just sleep for
> 25ms - without any randomness, or doubling of
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:13:12 +1000:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was looking through the "Getting Involved" section of the Subversion
> > website, and decided to start by writing a regression test for an
> > issue, starting
Daniel Becroft wrote on Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:27:15 +1000:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Daniel Becroft wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:13:12 +1000:
> > > 2) The problem also exists under the '--reintegrate' scenario, even
> > > after a subsequent commit. Would it b
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> Mike suggested to me that the fix for this problem can be made in
>> mod_dav_svn, since the update reporter already knows which properties
>> have changed, *regardless* of the send-all mode, but it discards this
>> information if send-all=FAL
On 18.01.2011 16:58, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> This would indicate that the reference counting happens too soon ... in
>> other words, that a pristine can be dereferenced whilst some part of the
>> code (or database) still refers to it. That breaks database con
On 18.01.2011 12:56, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
[ ... snip ... ]
But I think, the stack variable is certainly helpful
and easy to do.
Ok, I've done this (locally, still have to clean
Hi Johan,
I hope it wasn't inferred in any part of my email that "I" was trying to tell
you what to do it in any specific manner.
And although I was prompted by your thread, it was completely unrelated.
In my "day" job - I always strive for the simplest solution possible.
If the requirements of
15 matches
Mail list logo