Re: [PATCH] An svn_fspath__* API for '/'-prefixed paths

2010-11-22 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2010-11-18, Julian Foad wrote: > Any thoughts or concerns about this patch to add a path manipulation API > for '/fs/relative/style' aka '/repo/relative/style' paths ... > > svn_fspath__is_canonical() > svn_fspath__join() > svn_fspath__is_child() > svn_fspath__basename() > > so th

1.6.15 later today

2010-11-22 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
As noted elsewhere, 1.6.x is looking good right now, so I'm planning on cuttin 1.6.15 RSN. It may actually be several hours, as I'll be traveling, but I do plan on having it done by the end of the day CST (UTC -0600). Thanks, -Hyrum

Re: svn update select(2)

2010-11-22 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/21/2010 07:59 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hey Larry! > > Good to hear from you. Been quite a while :-P > > Yes, the delay is there to deal with filesystem timestamp resolution > issues. I don't recall the specifics of *why*, but Bad Things can > happen if a filesystem doesn't have enough resolu

Re: svn update select(2)

2010-11-22 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/21/2010 08:17 PM, Larry McVoy wrote: > We are trying to avoid parsing the dump format unless we have to. Just > want to keep it simple. Larry, Subversion provides C API support for parsing a dumpstream and calling a user-supplied collection of callback functions with the harvested data. "

RE: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people at the ApacheCon meetup)

2010-11-22 Thread Bolstridge, Andrew
> -Original Message- > From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] > Sent: 09 November 2010 16:42 > To: Hyrum K. Wright > Cc: Bolstridge, Andrew; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: How to get the message out (or: why there were only 6 people > at the ApacheCon meetup) > > On 1

RE: svn commit: r1037748 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_mergeinfo_private.h libsvn_subr/mergeinfo.c

2010-11-22 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: julianf...@apache.org [mailto:julianf...@apache.org] > Sent: maandag 22 november 2010 16:08 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1037748 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > include/private/svn_mergeinfo_private.h libsvn_subr/mergeinfo.c

RE: svn commit: r1037748 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_mergeinfo_private.h libsvn_subr/mergeinfo.c

2010-11-22 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-11-22, Bert Huijben wrote: > > svn_mergeinfo__add_suffix_to_mergeinfo(svn_mergeinfo_t *out_mergeinfo, > > svn_mergeinfo_t mergeinfo, > > - const char *suffix, > > + cons

Re: svn commit: r1036978 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svnsync_tests.py svnsync_tests_data/descend_into_replace.dump

2010-11-22 Thread Paul Burba
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > pbu...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:51:45 -: >> Author: pburba >> Date: Fri Nov 19 18:51:44 2010 >> New Revision: 1036978 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036978&view=rev >> Log: >> Cover a new failure use case

Re: svn update select(2)

2010-11-22 Thread Larry McVoy
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:35:12AM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/21/2010 07:59 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Hey Larry! > > > > Good to hear from you. Been quite a while :-P > > > > Yes, the delay is there to deal with filesystem timestamp resolution > > issues. I don't recall the specifics

[PATCH] Op-depth for copies - fixing lock_tests.py 40 - in progress

2010-11-22 Thread Julian Foad
After Philip's great work I see just three op-depth failures remaining: > FAIL: copy_tests.py 83: move a directory containing moved node > FAIL: lock_tests.py 40: uncommitted svn:needs-lock add/cp not read-only > FAIL: upgrade_tests.py 15: upgrade tree conflict data (f20->f21) lock_tests.py 40

Re: is_packed(noderev); revision root ID caching

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
(replying just to the /trunk issue for now; haven't digested the remainder of your mails yet) Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:23:49 +0100: > On 31.10.2010 16:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 13:40:12 -: >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1036978 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: svnsync_tests.py svnsync_tests_data/descend_into_replace.dump

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Paul Burba wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:13:09 -0500: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > pbu...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:51:45 -: > >> Author: pburba > >> Date: Fri Nov 19 18:51:44 2010 > >> New Revision: 1036978 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apach

Re: Ruby gem for subversion

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I don't see anything specific to windows in that file. Try changing that line and see what breaks? Benjamin Jaton wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 14:36:04 -0800: > I can see the ./build/win32/make_gem.rb that specifically set > s.platform = Gem::Platform::WIN32 > > Is there something that prev

Re: svn commit: r1037738 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ libsvn_client/ svn/ tests/cmdline/ tests/cmdline/svntest/

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:42:06 -: > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/update-cmd.c Mon Nov 22 14:42:05 2010 > @@ -39,6 +39,42 @@ > > /*** Code. ***/ > > +/* Print an update summary when there's more than one target to report > + about. */ > +static svn_erro

Re: Ruby gem for subversion

2010-11-22 Thread Joe Swatosh
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I don't see anything specific to windows in that file. > > Try changing that line and see what breaks? > > Benjamin Jaton wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 14:36:04 -0800: >> I can see the ./build/win32/make_gem.rb that specifically set >>     s