On 12.07.2010 19:43, Jack Bates wrote:
I'm considering writing some JavaScript to make commits to Subversion
repositories, using XMLHttpRequest
Does any code like this already exist? Are there any reasons I haven't
thought of, why this would be impossible (or prohibitively difficult?)
The purpo
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> BUG REPORT: The test cases for the Perl API SVN::Ra at
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/t/6ra.t
>
> currently lack tests for any of the functions needed to commit a change
> to the repos
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:40, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_wc.h Tue Jul 13 09:40:34 2010
>...
> -/** Similar to svn_wc_translated_file3(), but with an adm_access baton
> - * and relative paths instead of a wc_context and absolute paths, with
> - * a single pool, and
Having not followed any of this conversation, would it be valuable to
keep the eventual results in notes/wc-ng/ ?
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> After lots of discussion regarding the way NODE_DATA/4th tree should
> be working, I'm now ready to post a summary of the pro
For those that care, I've set up a daily cron job to generate the
trunk API docs:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/doc/api/trunk/
-Hyrum
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of
>> Hyrum K. Wright
>> Sent: donderdag 8 juli 2010 4:31
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: Do we better tol
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:48:52PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > I think it should check that a proper obstruction is notified and maybe that
> > a future update brings in the new data.
>
> Is this in the intended future behavior, or the c
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:48:52PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> > I think it should check that a proper obstruction is notified and maybe
>> > that
>> > a future update brings in
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for doing the work to produce/share Windows binaries.
>
> I am a little concerned that your announcement looks very similar to our
> official release announcements. (I realize you say "my release", etc.,
> but I find more si
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:07:30PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Could you file the issue?
Sure: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:07:30PM +0100, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Could you file the issue?
>
> Sure: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
>
Thanks. I've commented out the failing tests (swig-rb and JavaHL lack
a XFa
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
> While testing all kinds of silly argument combinations to find
> inconsistencies in argument handling I found this case where checkout
> reports a bogus error that covers up the real error.
>
> $ cd /path/to/wc
> $ svn status ^/ foo
>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Jul 13 14:46:05 2010
> New Revision: 963741
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963741&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_client/cmdline.c:
> (check_root_url_of_target): Catch SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND in addition
> to
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> It's not really very magic. :) We have four sets of conversions:
> external to/from UTF-8, UTF-8 to/from filesystem path. I believe I
> misled you a bit.
Brane, thanks for the concise explanation of the assumed design.
unfortunately for z/
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 05:37:11PM +0200, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
> Meanwhile Michael Pilato and Stefan Sperling gave me even
> more input (thank you) and I was able to prepare a suite of tests
> modeled after others in subversion/tests in order to check most
> of the other commands which, like 'add' a
I'm trying to track down the swig ruby bindings failures which are
still happening on trunk. The errors for both tests are similar:
subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c:2252: Svn::Error::WcDbError: Pristine
text not found
/home/hwright/dev/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby
Erik is planning on updating the docs, once it stabilizes a little bit.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:34, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> Having not followed any of this conversation, would it be valuable to
> keep the eventual results in notes/wc-ng/ ?
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Erik Huelsmann
Link it from the docs, or people will forget the URL...
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 07:30, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> For those that care, I've set up a daily cron job to generate the
> trunk API docs:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/doc/api/trunk/
>
> -Hyrum
>
I'm on it.
On 07/13/2010 11:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Link it from the docs, or people will forget the URL...
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 07:30, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> For those that care, I've set up a daily cron job to generate the
>> trunk API docs:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/
Whoops, I actually committed something in r963772 before I saw this
mail. Feel free to tweak it.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I'm on it.
>
> On 07/13/2010 11:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Link it from the docs, or people will forget the URL...
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2
Bonus points if somebody writes a script to do all this website update
release magic for us.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:53 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Tue Jul 13 15:53:32 2010
> New Revision: 963767
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963767&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/publish/docs/c
On 07/13/2010 11:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 05:37:11PM +0200, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
>> Meanwhile Michael Pilato and Stefan Sperling gave me even
>> more input (thank you) and I was able to prepare a suite of tests
>> modeled after others in subversion/tests in order to ch
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:00:14PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 11:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > If we enforce a certain syntax for certain types of arguments, we should
> > probably provide a way to relax the checks in case someone really
> > wants to version files or direct
On 07/04/2010 12:08 PM, Igor Sereda wrote:
> [[[
> Fix for svndumpfilter.
>
> * subversion/svndumpfilter/main.c
>
> Problem Reproduction Sequence:
>
> 1. Get a dump of a repository with empty revisions (for example, by
> pulling a subdirectory of a remote repo with svnsync).
> 2. Run svndu
On 07/05/2010 12:31 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> switch_tests.py 21 is failing when I use serf although it passes when
> I use neon. The test involves a switch that fails because a directory
> to be added is obstructed by an unversioned directory. This causes
> the switch to fail and the test then
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:29:10PM +0200, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Along with the changes suggested by Bert and Daniel, this new version
> includes a few small bugfixes and feature additions contributed by
> David and Will, among others. Unfortunately, a diff of the changes
> made is
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:46:31PM -, dan...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dannas
> Date: Tue Jul 13 18:46:31 2010
> New Revision: 963814
> @@ -933,6 +933,22 @@ svn_linenum_t
> svn_diff_hunk_get_trailing_context(const svn_hunk_t *hunk);
>
> /**
> + * Data type to manage parsing of properties
[Edward Ned Harvey]
> So I'm going to call this "problem solved." I'll just upgrade all the
> clients, the server, and the repo.
I notice you upgraded using dump / load. Did you also try upgrading
using 'svnadmin upgrade'? Should be somewhat less disruptive. It
would be good to know whether i
28 matches
Mail list logo