Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, 3 Jul 2010 at 09:09 +0300:
> Edward Ned Harvey wrote on Fri, 2 Jul 2010 at 20:11 -0400:
> > Long story short, I tried like hell to get the profiler to work, and didn't
> > succeed. I absolutely verified the -pg option was on both the compile and
> > the link, by reading
Edward Ned Harvey writes:
> Not sure what I should look at next. Should I try to figure out what
> (*handler) is? Is there a way to know what it is?
As I said in one of my earlier emails, use "gdb -p" to attach to a
running process and a backtrace will tell you exactly what code is
being exe
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:03, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Jun 29 10:03:22 2010
> New Revision: 958908
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=958908&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a c test to verify that we keep svn_wc_add3() compatibility working
> when we move our own code in libsvn_client
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 3 juli 2010 21:21
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r958908 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_wc/lock.c tests/libsvn_client/client-test.c
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:0
Go and grab your share at
https://tortoiseanalyze.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/tortoiseanalyze/OptimizedSVN/branches/prototype
It is SVN 1.7 + APR 1.3 + ZLIB 1.2.5 tuned for svnadmin and
threaded svnserve performance with FSFS. All tests pass on Linux.
-- Stefan^2.
What is this all about?
-
On 07/03/2010 06:28 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
What is this all about?
---
A couple of weeks ago, I started working on SVN's server performance.
Without access to a development repository, I found it hard to
develop a compelling solution to the underlying problems. Thus,
the
6 matches
Mail list logo
