On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:37:36AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 18:21, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >...
> >> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >...
> >> > As Bert explained, we need to remove them when the user runs "svn
> >> > resolved". He also noted that (somtimes) i
Hi C. Michael,
As a developer of non-svn stuff and a user of svn, not a developer of
svn, I support your notion that PATCH doesn't have any meaning.
I might also make the same comment about TASK. But that's another
issue for another day.
Craig
On May 7, 2010, at 9:39 AM, C. Michael Pilat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hyrum,
Am 06.05.2010 15:29, schrieb Hyrum K. Wright:
> I've noticed you've been submitting a number of patches to asvn, which
> resides in our contrib/ tree. Thanks! As you may know, the code in
> contrib/ is considered unsupported; in fact, the most
Hello Jörg,
> well, the reason I picked up asvn has been that I've been looking for a
> solution to store file permissions inside a Subversion repository.
...
> I found asvn via google by looking for "subversion store file
> permissions" in some old mailing. During the past years some people had
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Phil,
Am 10.05.2010 15:32, schrieb Philipp Marek:
>> well, the reason I picked up asvn has been that I've been looking for a
>> solution to store file permissions inside a Subversion repository.
> ...
>> I found asvn via google by looking for "s
Okay, this change has been made. Please refrain from using the PATCH issue
tracker type from now on. If you have a patch to post to a new tracker
item, create the item as a DEFECT or ENHANCEMENT or FEATURE, attach the
patch, and add the 'patch' keyword to the issue.
Thanks all!
-- With love, an
phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon May 10 16:00:53 2010
> New Revision: 942802
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=942802&view=rev
> Log:
> More svn_wc_entry_t removal. This changes the commit notification in
> some cases, but the new notification seems more consistent wi
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> phi...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: philip
>> Date: Mon May 10 16:00:53 2010
>> New Revision: 942802
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=942802&view=rev
>> Log:
>> More svn_wc_entry_t removal. This changes the commit notification in
>> some cases, but the n
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:57, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c Mon May 10 16:57:42 2010
> @@ -2388,10 +2388,10 @@ svn_wc__get_pristine_contents(svn_stream
>
> svn_error_clear(err);
>
> - return svn_error_return(svn_wc__get_revert_contents(contents,
Philip Martin wrote:
> $ svn diff -cr942802 ../src/subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
> Index: ../src/subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
> ===
> --- ../src/subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py (revision 942801)
> +++
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 13:34, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>...
> I asked about this because commit notification and action are pretty
> intimately entangled: if the notification is different, we almost certainly
> changed what got sent thru the commit editor, too. That may be fine in this
Agreed!
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> Does this mean that we no longer have the weirdness that 'svn cp REPOS WC'
> would create a tree like this:
>
> WC/target # scheduled as a real copy target
> WC/target/subthing# annotated as 'copied', but not a copy target
> WC/target/subt
Greg Stein writes:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 13:34, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>...
>> I asked about this because commit notification and action are pretty
>> intimately entangled: if the notification is different, we almost certainly
>> changed what got sent thru the commit editor, too. That m
Hello Jörg!
>> do you know about FSVS?
>
> since about one week: yes.
> It seems to be a very interessting project.
> I will take a closer look as soon as I've a little more time.
> However, for the requirements I'm facing in my current project,
> asvn seams to be the better choice. Mainly because
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
[...]
>
> Thanks for committing! I just got the last patch set out
> (zlib) and will start detailed performance measurements.
> Hopefully, all my other patches will then get committed
> as well ;)
>
> Currently, I get 2.6s (real) for an svn e
Any thoughts on this, people?
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 23:12, wrote:
>...
> A new errata has been filed to detail this issue, also noting that several
> clients do not attempt to use this removed functionality.
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/api-errata/wc006.txt Tue May 11 03:12:36 2010
> @@ -
16 matches
Mail list logo
