rdo...@apache.org writes:
> Author: rdonch
> Date: Wed Mar 24 22:39:24 2010
> New Revision: 927211
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927211&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c:
> (svn_wc__db_wclock_set): Pass levels_to_lock to svn_sqlite__bindf
>as a 64-bit value, as req
Philip Martin wrote:
> rdo...@apache.org writes:
>
> > Author: rdonch
> > Date: Wed Mar 24 22:39:24 2010
> > New Revision: 927211
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927211&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c:
> > (svn_wc__db_wclock_set): Pass levels_to_lock to svn_sql
Julian Foad writes:
> But that would obscure the reason for it and "int levels_to_lock" is the
> API idiom throughout Subversion.
OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set
passes zero for levels_to_lock, perhaps it doesn't need to be a
parameter at all.
--
Philip
On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
>> But that would obscure the reason for it and "int levels_to_lock" is the
>> API idiom throughout Subversion.
>
> OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set
> passes zero for levels_to_lock, perh
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> > OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set
> > passes zero for levels_to_lock, perhaps it doesn't need to be a
> > parameter at all.
>
> This is here strictly for backward compat. The access bato
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:03, wrote:
>...
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> (insert_base_node, svn_wc__db_op_set_last_mod_time): Pass integers to
> svn_sqlite__bindf as 64-bit values, as required by the latter. (The
> first one here is typedef'd to 'long int' which may not be the same o
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:06, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> > OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set
>> > passes zero for levels_to_lock, perhaps it doesn't need to be a
>> > parameter at all.
>>
>> T
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:06, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> >> On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:06 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> >> > OK. I've just noticed that every caller of svn_wc__db_wclock_set
> >> > passes zero for levels_to_lock, perhaps it doesn't need to be a
>
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:03, wrote:
> >...
> > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
> > (insert_base_node, svn_wc__db_op_set_last_mod_time): Pass integers to
> >svn_sqlite__bindf as 64-bit values, as required by the latter. (The
> >first one here is typedef'd to 'long in
Please revert. I'm working on fixing this properly.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:10, wrote:
> Author: stylesen
> Date: Thu Mar 25 14:10:11 2010
> New Revision: 927412
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927412&view=rev
> Log:
> Follow up r921604. Fix failing export test 11.
>
> * subversion/
Reverted in r927460.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:53, Greg Stein wrote:
> Please revert. I'm working on fixing this properly.
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:10, wrote:
>> Author: stylesen
>> Date: Thu Mar 25 14:10:11 2010
>> New Revision: 927412
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927412&
11 matches
Mail list logo
