Re: Issues 3525 & 3526 - please don't forget about these bogus tree conflicts

2010-03-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:10:06PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> * http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3525 - Locked >> file which is scheduled for delete causes tree conflict > > This one is a real bug. It happens be

Re: Issues 3525 & 3526 - please don't forget about these bogus tree conflicts

2010-03-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:40:30AM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > The only way to "fix" this self-inflicted tree conflict would > > be to require an update of the *entire* working copy before any changes > > can be committed. > > You m

Re: Issues 3525 & 3526 - please don't forget about these bogus tree conflicts

2010-03-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Thanks, Stefan. Your answers were very enlightening, as always :-). I really hope TC handling can be improved for cases like these (resolving them automatically or avoiding them), if possible even for 1.7. I have no idea how you guys are progressing on this front, but I guess a lot of the potentia

Looking to improve performance of svn annotate

2010-03-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi all, I'm very much looking forward to the performance (and other) improvements wc-ng will bring us. But there's more to svn performance than wc stuff :-). In our company, "svn annotate/blame/praise" is a known offender (people who attended subconf 2009 may remember me as the guy who complained

Re: switching added files -- Re: What revision should an added not yet commited node have?

2010-03-21 Thread neels
On 20 March 2010 06:02, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:37, neels wrote: >> On 19 March 2010 07:37, Daniel Näslund wrote: >>> I have some quirks with switching locally added files but that's for >>> another post. >> >> I once tested that switching the parent away depth-empty above