- yeah, that's the capability I miss compared to any other SCM system I know
(which is CVS, Perforce, and now - a little of git).
Add it to other smaller but also annoying things, and I am half the way into
git manual... Git has handy submodules which can be brought together into
any tree configura
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/19/2010 5:19 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> The patch was written on the 1.4.x branch but I svn switch'ed it to trunk
>> for easy application.
>>
>
> I would suggest one bit of alternate code that is a bit more condensed, any
> concern?;
>
> +static int same
fab...@apache.org wrote:
> > Minor fixes in the French translation:
> >
> > * réçent -> récent
> > * the proper French translation for "consistent" is usually "cohérent"
> > * "consiste seulement en des espaces" -> "est constitué seulement d'espaces"
>
> Done in trunk r900912.
Thank you, Philippe
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu]
> Sent: woensdag 20 januari 2010 10:17
> To: William A. Rowe Jr.
> Cc: Bert Huijben; d...@apr.apache.org; 'Philip Martin'; 'Bert Huijben';
> dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Patch] RE: Windows drive letter check fails
Daniel Näslund wrote:
> I've added mark and seek handlers to svn_subst_stream_translated().
> Those two handlers are just wrappers that calls the underlying
> streams handlers. Now that works in my test but what happens if we set a
> mark in front of what we've read so far from the file? We might e
Stefan Sperling writes:
> This is quite a dangerous bug isn't it?
> Anyone relying on authz for confidentially would rightfully regard
> this as a security issue. I think we should fix the code.
> Most people have probably written their authz rules according to the
> book, so their authz rules ma
Hi Dan,
Here is your post Christmas reminder
As always - if you need some help - please don't be shy to ask.
Gavin.
On 06/12/2009, at 1:58 AM, Dan Engel wrote:
> Thanks, Gavin.
>
> I am still working on it. I applied some of the suggestions that Philip
> made, where I have it running at work
Hi Neels,
Just thought I would check with you - with respect to do you require me to keep
an eye on this thread for the purposes of pinging the list etc?
Gavin.
On 26/12/2009, at 12:48 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Sorry, hold this patch.
>
> Greg,
>
> I'm asking you since you said there may
Hi Chris,
Just thought I would chase you up with this.
Were you going to make the changes suggested by Julian - or were you happy for
him to "tidy it up" and commit it?
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 04/01/2010, at 9:15 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09, Chris Foote wrote:
>> I have inc
Ping.
This updated submission has received no comments.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 06/01/2010, at 10:53 PM, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:11:31PM +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 07:45:12AM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
>>> + err = svn_wc__node_get_ur
Hi Everyone,
I have just noticed that Chris has indeed provided an updated patch;
Which is in need of a review / comments etc.
I would normally place a link here - but I can;t find a convenient way to find
a message URL - so I will ping the new thread separately.
Please allow me to "steal" this
Ping.
This updated patch submission has received no comments.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 11/01/2010, at 10:59 PM, Chris Foote wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> I've made the changes as you suggested.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> [[[
> Make it easy to (re)run specific tests on windows by adding a --test/-t
>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
wrote:
> Ping.
> This updated submission has received no comments.
>
Thanks for the reminder Gavin.
> On 07/01/2010, at 7:10 PM, Ed wrote:
>
[..]
>>
>> Well, in that case here's an updated patch.
>>
>> Log:
>>
>> [[[
>> Updated the crash repor
Ping.
This updated submission has received no comments.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 07/01/2010, at 7:10 PM, Ed wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Ed wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On the assumption that there is such an e-mail as
>>> svn-break...@subversion.apache.org, th
Apart from Kannan pinging his own update;
This submission update has received no new comments.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 07/01/2010, at 11:40 PM, Kannan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Julian Foad wrote:
> [..]
>> I looked for assignments to the "activity_coll" fie
Hi Ivan,
Just thought I would send you an email and check if you had managed to review
Julian's comments?
And as always - please don;t be shy about asking for any assistance you might
need.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 14/01/2010, at 2:04 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> (I've tweaked the subject line
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:04:16PM +1100, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
> Ping.
> This updated submission has received no comments.
Thanks for pinging. I'm keeping an eye on this, I'll try to get
to reviewing this properly by the end of this week.
Stefan
rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Jan 20 11:58:37 2010
> New Revision: 901150
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901150&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/publish/docs/community-guide/index.html
> (release branches): Make this section Y2010 compliant ;-)
[...]
> - Ver
I'm trying to hunt down a strange issue where children in directories
added during a merge (i.e. copied from another branch) get committed
as "replaced" rather than "added".
This happens with a 1.6.x client (server version doesn't matter)
and only over http:// (both neon and serf).
It's not a pre
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 20:05 +0530, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 07:23 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Mark Phippard wrote:
> >>
> >>> Any idea how it works? CHECKOUT is serviced by the proxy server
> >>>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Just thought I would send you an email and check if you had managed to
> review Julian's comments?
> And as always - please don;t be shy about asking for any assistance you might
> need.
This email is already in my task
pet...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: peters
> Date: Wed Jan 20 16:31:57 2010
> New Revision: 901264
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901264&view=rev
> Log:
> Updates and cleanups to the Community Guide.
THANK YOU!
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed D
cmpil...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Wed Jan 20 17:45:08 2010
> New Revision: 901302
[...]
> [This commit notification would consist of 139 parts,
> which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
I *heart* this mailer script.
--
C. Michael Pilato
Co
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
> wrote:
>> Ping.
>> This updated submission has received no comments.
>>
>
> Thanks for the reminder Gavin.
>
>> On 07/01/2010, at 7:10 PM, Ed wrote:
>>
> [..]
>>>
>>> Well, in that cas
Any reason why we shouldn't be able to run 'svn log' on an uncommitted copy?
For example (this is with tr...@901239):
### A WC with no local changes:
>svn st
### Check the log of a file:
>svn log A\D\H\psi
r4 | jr
[rhuij...@apache.org]
> ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r898963
> Votes:
> +1: peters
> + -0: rhuijben (I see test failures on trunk which could be related to
> + these patches. I'll update when I have more information)
Hmm, what platform? It passed 'make check'
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> 1.6.8 is a dud, and will never see the light of day. Thankfully, we found
> the problems with ra_serf and the deps during the testing, and appropriate
> fixes have been nominated.
>
> My plan is to reroll 1.6.9, but holding the roll until
Hello,
I found no way to delete file external once svn:externals property has
been set (not committed) and update performed once. See attached
reproduction script for details.
I think update should remove file external when its definition is
removed from svn:externals property. What do you think
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:42:30PM +0100, Alexander Kitaev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found no way to delete file external once svn:externals property has
> been set (not committed) and update performed once. See attached
> reproduction script for details.
>
> I think update should remove file externa
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:42:30PM +0100, Alexander Kitaev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found no way to delete file external once svn:externals property has
> been set (not committed) and update performed once. See attached
> reproduction script for details.
>
> I think update should remove file externa
1.6.9 is up, the magic revision is r901367:
http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.9/
Download, test, sign and send your sigs back to me. (And don't even think
about declaring this as "released" until I say so, for reasons I won't expound
upon here.)
-Hyrum
Thanks Lieven.
Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
On 21/01/2010, at 4:53 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
>> wrote:
>>> Ping.
>>> This updated submission has received no comments.
>>>
>>
>> Thank
SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows Vista SP2
VS 2008 SP1
Java 1.6
COMPONENTS:
Apache2.2.11
APR 1.3.5
APR-UTIL1.3.7
OpenSSL 0.9.8k
Neon(from deps)
Serf (from deps)
ZLib (from deps)
SQLite (from deps)
VERIF
Is the COPYRIGHT value used anywhere? Or are you simply trying to keep
it out of the output? If so, then you can simply use a comment: [#
]. It works across multiple lines.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:45, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Jan 20 15:45:30 2010
> New Revision: 901244
>
> U
34 matches
Mail list logo
