Re: [PATCH] Augment the awful "200 OK" error message when can't connect to repository

2010-01-11 Thread Philip Martin
Ivan Zhakov writes: > - return ne_xml_parse(pwb->parser, data, len); > + parser_status = ne_xml_parse(pwb->parser, data, len); > + if (parser_status) > + { > + /* Pass XML parser error. */ > + ne_set_error(pwb->req->ne_sess, "%s", ne_xml_get_error(pwb->parser)); > + } > + > + retu

Re: [PATCH] Fix #3544 - svn update does not restore excluded files

2010-01-11 Thread Philip Martin
Kannan writes: > Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c > === > --- subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c (revision 896759) > +++ subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c (working copy) > @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@ >el

[PATCH] v3: Simplify running specific tests on Windows

2010-01-11 Thread Chris Foote
Hi Julian, I've made the changes as you suggested. Regards, Chris [[[ Make it easy to (re)run specific tests on windows by adding a --test/-t option. The tests can also specify specific test number(s) to run. * win-tests.py (_usage_exit): Add the --test/-t option to the help. (tests_to_run)

Re: [PATCH] Fix #3544 - svn update does not restore excluded files

2010-01-11 Thread Kannan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philip Martin wrote: [..] >> Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c >> === >> --- subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c (revision 896759) >> +++ subversion/libsvn_wc/entries.c (working copy) >

Re: ASF: what do we have left?

2010-01-11 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Did we successfully release something under the incubation's watch? Or was success not a prerequisite? :-) Greg Stein wrote: > Nothing. We should start a graduation vote this week. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:17, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> It's been a few weeks, since we've talked about i

Re: ASF: what do we have left?

2010-01-11 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
We have not yet released while part of the Incubator. However, we went through the motions and successfully pulled a release. Does that count? (FWIW, it looks like the relevant revisions have been approved for merge, so as soon as that gets taken care of, I'm going to roll 1.6.8.) -Hyrum On

Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests. The only failure was in the ruby bindings: [[[ hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \ /usr/bin/ruby -I /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindin

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Joe Swatosh
Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests.  The only > failure was in the ruby bindings: > > [[[ > hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb > cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests.  The only > failure was in the ruby bindings: > > [[[ > hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb > cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \ >  

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-11 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> We need a website at subversion.apache.org. We've put up some >> placeholder pages, and I recently started playing with an >> Anakia-generated site in it's place. I've come across a few questions, >> and they are t

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Burba
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests.  The only > failure was in the ruby bindings: > > [[[ > hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb > cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \ >  

Re: [PATCH] Augment the awful "200 OK" error message when can't connect to repository

2010-01-11 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Ivan Zhakov writes: > >> -  return ne_xml_parse(pwb->parser, data, len); >> +  parser_status = ne_xml_parse(pwb->parser, data, len); >> +  if (parser_status) >> +  { >> +      /* Pass XML parser error. */ >> +      ne_set_error(pwb->req->ne_

svn+ssh issues with svn 1.6.6 on windows (especially for svn-external repo)

2010-01-11 Thread Magnus Torfason
I wanted to send a word to the developers about strange behavior by Subversion on Windows when using svn+ssh to connect to an external (linux) host, with repositories that contain a number of svn-externals entries. I recently upgraded both SlikSVN and TortoiseSVN from 1.6.1 to 1.6.6. After th

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-11 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> First, we need to decide if we want a hierarchical URL space or a flat >> one; if we want self-describing document basenames or if we don't care. >> It's the difference between /svn_1.6_releasenotes.html and >> /releases/notes/1.6.html (or maybe /release-notes/1.6.html), i

Re: A website for subversion.apache.org

2010-01-11 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >>> First, we need to decide if we want a hierarchical URL space or a flat >>> one; if we want self-describing document basenames or if we don't care. >>> It's the difference between /svn_1.6_releasenotes.html and >>>

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Philip Martin
"Hyrum K. Wright" writes: > After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests. The only > failure was in the ruby bindings: > > [[[ > hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb > cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \ > /usr/bin/ruby -I > /hom

Re: ASF: what do we have left?

2010-01-11 Thread Craig L Russell
When we discussed graduation requirements on the incubator general list, the idea was to have the incubator review a release made by the team, and review the process of releasing. There is still the open discussion of whether any of the Java package names need to be changed for an Apache re

Re: svn+ssh issues with svn 1.6.6 on windows (especially for svn-external repo)

2010-01-11 Thread Magnus Torfason
After some further exploration, I have an update on my issue with svn up failing on my svn-externals-infested repository. Below, I report an alternative workaround, and the output of ps while doing the update. On 1/11/2010 11:53 AM, Magnus Torfason wrote: 2: svn update (through TSVN): At the

[PATCH] #3493 svn patch skips missing directories

2010-01-11 Thread Daniel Näslund
Hi! [[[ Fix #3493 - svn patch skips missing dirs. * subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c (svn_client_patch): Replace the last adm_access calls. Needed to be able to use the write-locks in svn_client__make_local_parents(). (apply_textdiffs, apply_one_patch): Change ctx parameter to be non

Re: svn+ssh issues with svn 1.6.6 on windows (especially for svn-external repo)

2010-01-11 Thread kmradke
Magnus Torfason wrote on 01/11/2010 01:39:18 PM: > After some further exploration, I have an update on my issue with svn up > failing on my svn-externals-infested repository. Below, I report an > alternative workaround, and the output of ps while doing the update. > > On 1/11/2010 11:53 AM, M

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 11, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > "Hyrum K. Wright" writes: > >> After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests. The only >> failure was in the ruby bindings: >> >> [[[ >> hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb >> cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/sub

Re: svn+ssh issues with svn 1.6.6 on windows (especially for svn-external repo)

2010-01-11 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Magnus Torfason wrote on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 at 11:53 -0500: > 1: svnsync (through SSVN): > > A svnsync process from an external server that had always worked did no > longer complete successfully. The error message was: > > plink: unknown option "-q" > Connection terminated > > I don't know wh

Re: Ruby test failure on 1.6.x

2010-01-11 Thread Joe Swatosh
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > >> "Hyrum K. Wright" writes: >> >>> After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests.  The only >>> failure was in the ruby bindings: >>> >>> [[[ >>> hwri...@orac:~/dev/

Re: [PATCH] Fix #3544 - svn update does not restore excluded files

2010-01-11 Thread Kannan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kannan wrote: [..] Attaching herewith is the updated patch, as per Philip's feedback. [[[ Log: Fix issue #3544 -- svn update does not restore excluded files. * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c (complete_directory): Call `svn_wc__set_depth()' w