On 08/19/2010 09:15 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> What's the harm in leaving the behavior in the old APIs even though it's
> not what you intended? Please read the docs for the API again - that
> intention isn't documented so the old API works as documented.
As someone who was close to the project when
On 18.08.2010 21:58, Bert Huijben wrote:
I've checked r986510 and I like to add some comments:
In libsvn_client/deprecated.c, svn_client_status4() you pass FALSE for
the new sticky param. But that's wrong: in 1.6.x and previous versions,
the depth was always respected/enforced. That's why I noti
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 13:37
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Hyrum K. Wright'; 'C. Michael Pilato'; 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() an
On 18.08.2010 21:58, Bert Huijben wrote:
In libsvn_client/deprecated.c, svn_client_status4() you pass FALSE for
the new sticky param. But that's wrong: in 1.6.x and previous versions,
the depth was always respected/enforced. That's why I noticed the
changed behavior in the first place!
Shouldn't
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 17.08.2010 23:41, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Maybe I don't understand that change:
--depth specifies a depth to
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 11:39
> To: Hyrum K. Wright
> Cc: C. Michael Pilato; Bert Huijben; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() and depth
>
> On 17.08.201
On 17.08.2010 23:41, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Maybe I don't understand that change:
--depth specifies a depth to use for the command. If I want the command
to use the depth of the working copy, I
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> Maybe I don't understand that change:
>> --depth specifies a depth to use for the command. If I want the command
>> to use the depth of the working copy, I specify an unknown depth or none
>>
On 17.08.2010 22:45, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Maybe I don't understand that change:
--depth specifies a depth to use for the command. If I want the command
to use the depth of the working copy, I specify an unknown depth or none
at all. But if I specify
On 17.08.2010 22:29, Bert Huijben wrote:
But 'svn status' with a --set-depth would mean that this call could
change the WC?
Until now, 'svn st' didn't change the WC at all, i.e., it was a
read-only operation. So is such a change really wanted or necessary?
No it doesn't change the WC, but it s
On 08/17/2010 01:42 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Maybe I don't understand that change:
> --depth specifies a depth to use for the command. If I want the command
> to use the depth of the working copy, I specify an unknown depth or none
> at all. But if I specify a depth, I would assume the command to r
On 17.08.2010 22:32, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 08/17/2010 12:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Like I said in r957917, I think we should fix this in a different way.
The difference is between:
What would you get with
* svn up --depth infinity
and
* svn up --set-depth infinity
svn status --depth infi
On 08/17/2010 12:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> Like I said in r957917, I think we should fix this in a different way.
>>
>> The difference is between:
>> What would you get with
>> * svn up --depth infinity
>> and
>> * svn up --set-depth infinity
>>
>> svn status --depth infinity used to show the la
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:45
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: svn_client_status5() and depth
>
> On 17.08.2010 21:37, Bert Huijben wrote:
On 17.08.2010 21:37, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:28
To: Subversion Development
Subject: svn_client_status5() and depth
Hi,
* check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co
file:///d
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:28
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: svn_client_status5() and depth
>
> Hi,
>
> * check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co
> fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 17 augustus 2010 12:28
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: svn_client_status5() and depth
>
> Hi,
>
> * check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co
> fi
Hi,
* check out a folder with depth svn_depth_empty (svn co
file:///d:/testrepo/trunk testwc)
* cd into that folder (cd testwc)
* run 'svn st -u -v --depth infinity'
In 1.6.x, I get the status for all the files under that folder that
exist in the repository.
With the latest trunk (r986453),
18 matches
Mail list logo
