Stefan Küng writes:
> from a few crash reports sent in for TSVN I was finally able to pin
> down the problem:
>
> in libsvn_client\delete.c, line 240 there's a call
> repos_relpath = svn_uri__is_child(repos_root, uri, pool);
>
> but that can return NULL.
> further below then that repos_relpath is
Stefan Küng wrote:
> on trunk, svn_uri__is_child() has been replaced with svn_uri_skip_ancestor()
> (r1198802), but it works the same as svn_uri__is_child() from what I can see.
Just answering this bit: no, _skip_ancestor() intentionally returns "" if the
child is equal to the parent, whereas _i
Hi,
from a few crash reports sent in for TSVN I was finally able to pin down
the problem:
in libsvn_client\delete.c, line 240 there's a call
repos_relpath = svn_uri__is_child(repos_root, uri, pool);
but that can return NULL.
further below then that repos_relpath is passed to svn_ra_check_path
3 matches
Mail list logo
