On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:40:17 +0100
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Assume for a second that 'svn patch' already had the ability to flag
> conflicts in the working copy (this is a planned feature). Should we
> then still create an unversioned skip file or do something else?
I like the idea of being able
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:03:41AM +0100, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
>> I've just used 'svn patch'. There were missing target files, but I only
>> noticed a lot later; because all the text conflicts had .svnpatch.rej
>> files, but the missing targets were only listed in 'svn p
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:03:41AM +0100, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> I've just used 'svn patch'. There were missing target files, but I only
> noticed a lot later; because all the text conflicts had .svnpatch.rej
> files, but the missing targets were only listed in 'svn patch' output.
>
> So in my par
I've just used 'svn patch'. There were missing target files, but I only
noticed a lot later; because all the text conflicts had .svnpatch.rej
files, but the missing targets were only listed in 'svn patch' output.
So in my particular case it would have helped to have .svnpatch.rej
files for missing
4 matches
Mail list logo