On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 19:46, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On 03.05.2011 19:46, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
wrote:
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the si
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Using a build from three days ago, I found that
>>> svn info conflicted_file
>>> doesn't report the simple conflict (no
On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
conflict).
The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_w
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using a build from three days ago, I found that
> svn info conflicted_file
> doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
> conflict).
>
> The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_wc_info_t struct reads:
> Array o
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
conflict).
The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_wc_info_t struct reads:
Array of const svn_wc_conflict_description2_t * which contains info
on an
6 matches
Mail list logo