"Bert Huijben" writes:
> How would this handle deleted nodes in one layer (then some overlays) and
> then calling _read_children(). I think that would become a union/select over
> multiple layers? We already had some performance issues there in the past
> and I hope this only makes this query eas
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: donderdag 19 augustus 2010 3:39
> To: Greg Stein
> Cc: Bert Huijben; dev@subversion.apache.org; phi...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/
Greg Stein writes:
> But that said, there is an argument for combining all three conceptual
> tables into one. Is that was you guys were suggesting?
Yes. The tables are so similar. For example, base_node's
repos_id/repos_relpath/revnum and the working_node's
copyfrom_id/copyfrom_relpath/copyfr
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:05, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
>> Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 12:17
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r986865 - /subversi
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: woensdag 18 augustus 2010 12:17
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r986865 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/node-data
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Au
5 matches
Mail list logo
