Thanks for the detailed response,
Bert
-Original Message-
From: "Julian Foad"
Sent: 1-5-2014 15:12
To: "Bert Huijben"
Cc: "dev@subversion.apache.org"
Subject: Re: svn commit:
r1591301-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mergeinfo.c
Bert Huij
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Are you sure that it doesn't return the mergeinfo as it applies to the
> target, even if it has found that information by looking at the parent?
> (That is what I tried to say)
Hi, Bert. Note the comment on the code I changed:
/* Get the TARGET_WCPATH's explicit mergeinfo.
Are you sure that it doesn't return the mergeinfo as it applies to the target,
even if it has found that information by looking at the parent? (That is what I
tried to say)
I'm not familiar enough with this code to really review it from just the code,
but this eliding code is quite sensitive a
Bert Huijben wrote:
> This might make us add svn:mergeinfo on nodes that didn't have this property
> before eliding, while the old code tried to avoid that by checking to see if
> the value was inherited from an ancestor.
Hi Bert. I can't quite parse your sentence unambiguously, but I believe this
16:12
To: "comm...@subversion.apache.org"
Subject: svn commit: r1591301
-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mergeinfo.c
Author: julianfoad
Date: Wed Apr 30 14:12:08 2014
New Revision: 1591301
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1591301
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_client/mergeinfo.c
(sv
5 matches
Mail list logo
