On 1/5/14, 3:13 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> That raises the question: why is it not a common feature request here on this
> list? And what's wrong with telling users to use the RA API instead of writing
> myriad wrappers for it? The only "hard" part of that is creating the RA
> session, and we alread
st have found
> the fsfs symptoms months from now when releasing 1.9)
That's irrelevant (on this list). I won't say a word about what the
above statement implies for your QA workflow. :)
-- Brane
> -Original Message-
> From: "Branko Čibej"
> Sent: 05/01/
SharpSvn we would just have found the fsfs symptoms months from now
when releasing 1.9)
Bert
-Original Message-
From: "Branko Čibej"
Sent: 05/01/2014 04:51
To: "Subversion Development"
Subject: Re: svn commit:
r1555350-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc
On 05.01.2014 01:53, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> All your arguments would be valid and I would fully agree
> with them, if the FS layer was the root cause of the pool
> issue. However, IMO, that is not the case and r1555297
> merely accidentally caused free memory to be reused
> earlier t
d pool handling by destroying the mtcc with its
> parent pool instead of partly destroying it in some API function.
>
> -- Stefan^2.
>
> --
>> From: stef...@apache.org
>> Sent: 4-1-2014 15:05
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>>
t: svn commit: r1555350 -/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 4 14:04:36 2014
New Revision: 1555350
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1555350
Log:
Fix segfault in svnmucc.
* subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
(svn_client_mtcc_commit): We explicitly destroy the
quot;Stefan Fuhrmann"
Sent: 4-1-2014 22:26
To: "Bert Huijben"
Cc: "dev@subversion.apache.org" ;
"comm...@subversion.apache.org"
Subject: Re: svn commit:
r1555350-/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Bert Huijben
pool instead of partly destroying it in some API function.
-- Stefan^2.
--
> From: stef...@apache.org
> Sent: 4-1-2014 15:05
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1555350
> -/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c
>
especially generated bindings (like swig) have strange pool handling much
longer.
Bert
-Original Message-
From: "stef...@apache.org"
Sent: 4-1-2014 15:05
To: "comm...@subversion.apache.org"
Subject: svn commit: r1555350 -/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_c
9 matches
Mail list logo
