On 12/5/13 6:13 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
>
>> I think a hotcopy should be a drop-in replica in most respects,
>> so it can be used easily in case the original repository is lost.
>> If people want to change access permissions they should do so explicitly.
>
> I think ho
Stefan Sperling writes:
> I think a hotcopy should be a drop-in replica in most respects,
> so it can be used easily in case the original repository is lost.
> If people want to change access permissions they should do so explicitly.
I think hotcopy should respect umask.
> So copying permission
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:13:42AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Sperling writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:53:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:38:05PM -, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> >> > @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ svn_sqlite__hotcopy(const char *src
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:53:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:38:05PM -, phi...@apache.org wrote:
>> > @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ svn_sqlite__hotcopy(const char *src_path
>> > svn_sqlite__db_t *dst_db;
>> > sqlite3_backup *backu
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:53:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:38:05PM -, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> > @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ svn_sqlite__hotcopy(const char *src_path
> > svn_sqlite__db_t *dst_db;
> > sqlite3_backup *backup;
> > int rc1, rc2;
> > +
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:38:05PM -, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Dec 4 18:38:04 2013
> New Revision: 1547873
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1547873
> Log:
> Another part of issue 3437, rep-cache.db created with wrong permissions.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlit
6 matches
Mail list logo