Hi Markus,
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just another crazy idea:
>
> The main problem with the parallelization in ra_serf seems to be the number
> of http requests (which potentially causes a high number of authentications
> and tcp connections).
>
> Maybe we
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> [ changing subject to make topic more visible]
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
Author: cmpila
HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
Von: justin.erenkra...@gmail.com [mailto:justin.erenkra...@gmail.com] Im
Auftrag von Justin Erenkrantz
Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 15:15
An: Lieven Govaerts
Cc: Johan Corveleyn; dev@subversion.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1415864 -
/subversion
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 01.12.2012 22:18, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Completely agree.
>>
>> My point was that in theory skelta-mode is cool, but it still needs a
>> lot of work to get it really done.
>
> Sorry? I've had "http-library = serf" in ~/.subversion/config fo
On 01.12.2012 22:18, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Completely agree.
>
> My point was that in theory skelta-mode is cool, but it still needs a
> lot of work to get it really done.
Sorry? I've had "http-library = serf" in ~/.subversion/config for years,
and have seen no problems. What does it take, in your
[ changing subject to make topic more visible]
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: cmpilato
>>> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
>>> New Revision: 1415864
>>>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I feel pretty strongly that we should at minimum use the send-all
> approach when talking to pre-1.8 servers. Even though in some
> situations it could still offer good performance. I just think it
> would be more respectful to our users (
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:38 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 05:25 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2012 05:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Da
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
>> New Revision: 1415864
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Implement in ra_serf "send-all" mode suppor
Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:50:29 -0500:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> > On 01.12.2012 14:31, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > And, yes, that clearly could all be done in time for 1.8 without
> > > jeopardizing the timelines one tiny bit. =P
> >
>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 01.12.2012 14:31, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > And, yes, that clearly could all be done in time for 1.8 without
> > jeopardizing the timelines one tiny bit. =P
>
> Eep ... :)
>
>
> Another thing I've been thinking about is this: Why are we
On 01.12.2012 14:31, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> And, yes, that clearly could all be done in time for 1.8 without
> jeopardizing the timelines one tiny bit. =P
Eep ... :)
Another thing I've been thinking about is this: Why are we using SHA1
checksums on the server and on the wire for consistency
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> There are some scenario's where either the server admin or the user
> can decide if parallel requests make sense or not.
>
> I'm specifically thinking of the use Kerberos per request
> authentication. These responses can't be cached on the
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering whether your concerns apply to both internet-wide
>> deployments and local (all on the same LAN) ones.
>
>
> That line is certainly a fair one to draw in the sand.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I'm wondering whether your concerns apply to both internet-wide
> deployments and local (all on the same LAN) ones.
>
That line is certainly a fair one to draw in the sand. That said, I think
the internal use case cries out even *more* fo
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
>> New Revision: 1415864
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Implement in ra_serf "send-all" mode support
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:36:30AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Here's my suggestion for consideration - let's experiment with this setting
> in the beta release process with the setting as-is - that is we always do
> the parallel updates unconditionally (except perhaps when svnrdump is being
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
> New Revision: 1415864
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement in ra_serf "send-all" mode support for update-style REPORTs
> and their responses. (Currently disabled
On 11/30/2012 05:25 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 05:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
Author: cmpilato
Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
New Revision: 1415864
U
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 05:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: cmpilato
>>> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
>>> New Revision: 1415864
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
>>>
On 11/30/2012 05:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
>> New Revision: 1415864
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Implement in ra_serf "send-all" mode support for update-sty
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Fri Nov 30 21:54:35 2012
> New Revision: 1415864
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1415864&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement in ra_serf "send-all" mode support for update-style REPORTs
> and their responses. (Currently disabled
22 matches
Mail list logo
