On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.12.2012 02:08, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > The ineffectiveness of our use of memcached in 1.6 had
> > prompted the development of membuffer in the first place.
> >
> > Despite the relevant APR bug that got fixed only recently,
> > there
On 20.12.2012 02:08, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> The ineffectiveness of our use of memcached in 1.6 had
> prompted the development of membuffer in the first place.
>
> Despite the relevant APR bug that got fixed only recently,
> there are fundamental limitations compared to a SHM-based
> implementatio
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Resent to the correct list.
>
> On 17.12.2012 11:41, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 17.12.2012 11:25, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> stef...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 00:21:26 -:
> >>> Author: stefan2
> >>> Date: Mon Nov 26 00:21:26
Resent to the correct list.
On 17.12.2012 11:41, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.12.2012 11:25, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> stef...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 00:21:26 -:
>>> Author: stefan2
>>> Date: Mon Nov 26 00:21:26 2012
>>> New Revision: 1413451
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/v
stef...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 00:21:26 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Mon Nov 26 00:21:26 2012
> New Revision: 1413451
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1413451&view=rev
> Log:
> On the cache-server branch.
>
> * BRANCH-README: add
>
> Added:
> subversion/branche
5 matches
Mail list logo