Oh, I think that's a good idea! I'll go ahead and revert r1169851 now
in the hopes of implementing this in the next day or so.
-Hyrum
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How about having the tests use svn_error_raise_on_malfunction() by
> default and svn_error_abort_on_malfu
How about having the tests use svn_error_raise_on_malfunction() by
default and svn_error_abort_on_malfunction() if --allow-segfaults is
passed?
We can then drop the --trap-assertion-failures option.
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 15:46:45 -0500:
> It is no different than passing --t
It is no different than passing --trap-assertion-failures. I didn't
even know that option existed prior to your mail.
However, --trap-assertion-failures has the unfortunate property that
it isn't enabled by default in a standard 'make check' run, so the
tests still abort() rather than continue.
How is that different from using svn_error_raise_on_malfunction()?
i.e., from passing --trap-assertion-failures ?
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 18:03:42 -:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon Sep 12 18:03:41 2011
> New Revision: 1169851
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=
4 matches
Mail list logo
