On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> The problem for application builders is that you can't just get the property
> here.
>
> You can get the new BASE version of the property and the new ACTUAL version
> of the property (which is usually the old actual property on proper
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: woensdag 15 juni 2011 12:12
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1135635 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:55:1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:55:19AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:33:46 +0300:
> > s...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 15:10:50 -:
> > > + svn_stringbuf_appendcstr(buf, _("Local property value:\n"));
> > > + if (mine_is_binary)
>
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:33:46 +0300:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 15:10:50 -:
> > + svn_stringbuf_appendcstr(buf, _("Local property value:\n"));
> > + if (mine_is_binary)
> > +svn_stringbuf_appendcstr(buf, _("Cannot display: property v
Could we just print a hex dump of the value?
s...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 15:10:50 -:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Jun 14 15:10:50 2011
> New Revision: 1135635
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1135635&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c
> (prop_conflict_
5 matches
Mail list logo
