Johan Corveleyn writes:
> If this is hard to handle in practice, and a long running
> multi-threaded client has to wait anyway for an entire write operation
> to be finished, I'm wondering if it would be much easier for such
> clients to also always use the "exclusive locking" mode. It would make
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> - This 10 second timeout, for a read operation that is blocked by some
>> write transaction: is this implemented somewhere in the svn source
>> code (if so, where?), or is this some configuration setting for the
Johan Corveleyn writes:
> - This 10 second timeout, for a read operation that is blocked by some
> write transaction: is this implemented somewhere in the svn source
> code (if so, where?), or is this some configuration setting for the
> sqlite connection or something like that?
It's hard-coded,
I'd like to discuss this topic a bit further, to try and understand things more.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>>
>>> With this new "exclusive" mode it's probably quite clear (no
>>> parallellism possible at all), but beca
4 matches
Mail list logo
