Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-10-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This time it has compiled, but does not work. > > > > "svn list svn://admin/test/" works OK (IMHO because the ANONYMOUS > > mechanism is sufficient for that) but "svn co svn://admin/test/" > > dumps core immediately. > > > I hope I have found the problem. Does the patc

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-09-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:33:28PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > This time it has compiled, but does not work. > > "svn list svn://admin/test/" works OK (IMHO because the ANONYMOUS > mechanism is sufficient for that) but "svn co svn://admin/test/" > dumps core immediately. Hi Victor, I hope I h

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-09-07 Thread Victor Sudakov
Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am > > > > > > sorry, I > > > > > > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing > > > > > > ability does not go beyond scripting. > > > > > > > > > > Can you try this patch and let

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-09-06 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:59:22PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I > > > > > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing > > > > > ability does not go beyond scripting. > > >

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-09-06 Thread Victor Sudakov
Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I > > > > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing > > > > ability does not go beyond scripting. > > > > > > Can you try this patch and let me know if it works? > > > > Ple

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-09-02 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 01:08:52PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I > > > am a systems adm

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I > > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing > > ability does not go

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing > ability does not go beyond scripting. Can you try this patch and let me know if it works? I

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-08-21 Thread Victor Sudakov
> According to Daniel Shahaf, the subversion client uses the > server-reported mechanisms, in the order suggested by the server. > "There is no knob that lets you manipulate the order in the client." > Please see the thread "sasl mechanisms order" in users@ for m

sasl mechanisms order

2010-07-27 Thread Victor Sudakov
users. However it seems that there is a stalemate situation. According to Daniel Shahaf, the subversion client uses the server-reported mechanisms, in the order suggested by the server. "There is no knob that lets you manipulate the order in the client." Please see the thread "

Re: sasl mechanisms order

2010-07-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
CC += dev@ Victor Sudakov wrote on Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:53:44 +0700: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > > > I have the following line in /usr/local/lib/sasl2/svn.conf: > > > mech_list: gssapi digest-md5 anonymous > > > > > > How can I guarantee that the subversion client/server will always use >