On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 17:04 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann writes:
>
> > This is why I'm now proposing that we stop to leave behind the
> > -unchanged- files which are part of a copy or move operation.
>
> That sounds reasonable to me. I'd be surprised if making a versioned
> copy
Erik Huelsmann writes:
> This is why I'm now proposing that we stop to leave behind the
> -unchanged- files which are part of a copy or move operation.
That sounds reasonable to me. I'd be surprised if making a versioned
copy and then using revert to make it unversioned is something that
users
As Julian pointed out, I'm working on making 'revert' work with our
NODES table in the layered design situation. As part of that work, I
was studying the current behaviour of revert: supposedly, that's what
the behaviour of the new revert should look like in simple cases.
However, one of the thing
3 matches
Mail list logo
