On 21.05.2017 20:28, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sun, 21 May 2017 20:09 +0200:
On 15.11.2016 00:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:50:51 +0100:
On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrit
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sun, 21 May 2017 20:09 +0200:
> On 15.11.2016 00:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:50:51 +0100:
> >> On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't
> >>> enforce i
On 15.11.2016 00:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:50:51 +0100:
On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't
enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either
all values ar
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:50:51 +0100:
> On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't
> >enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either
> >all values are valid or no value is; a call such
On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't
enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either
all values are valid or no value is; a call such as
vwrite_tuple("(?r?r)", SVN_INVALID_REVNUM, (svn_revnum_t) 42)
During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't
enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either
all values are valid or no value is; a call such as
vwrite_tuple("(?r?r)", SVN_INVALID_REVNUM, (svn_revnum_t) 42)
would happily generate a «( 42 ) » tuple, i
6 matches
Mail list logo