Mario Brandt wrote on Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:13:10 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Do you see the same set of FAILs in both cases? (The tests are known to
> > PASS against 2.2 on all platforms and FS backends; so the fact you see
> > you see 68 fails ind
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do you see the same set of FAILs in both cases? (The tests are known to
> PASS against 2.2 on all platforms and FS backends; so the fact you see
> you see 68 fails indicates something's wrong, but it is likely
> independent of the httpd-2
Mario Brandt wrote on Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:33:14 +0100:
> Hi,
> the tests took felt forever. However.
>
>
> Against apache 2.2 without the patch
>
> C:\python27\python win-tests.py -r --httpd-dir=C:\Apache22-x86
> Summary of test results:
> 1452 tests PASSED
> 73 tests SKIPPED
> 21 tes
Hi,
the tests took felt forever. However.
Against apache 2.2 without the patch
C:\python27\python win-tests.py -r --httpd-dir=C:\Apache22-x86
Summary of test results:
1452 tests PASSED
73 tests SKIPPED
21 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
68 tests FAILED
against apache 2.4 with the pa
There are outstanding backport nominations in 1.7.x/STATUS, is your
patch needed even after merging them?
And on another note -- does the test suite pass? I've seen odd
behaviour with the tests last week and haven't had time to investigate
yet. (Either neon/bdb or serf/bdb.)
Mario Brandt wrote
In 1.7.x branch[1] svn fails to compile against apache 2.4. In trunk
it is already fixed.
Cheers
Mario
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.7.x/subversion/mod_dav_svn/
Index: util.c
===
--- util.c (revisi
Hi,
> What's configure.js?
sorry I meant the gen-make.py. I mixed that up in my head with the php
configure script.
> That's a wrong change -- it will break the build against 2.2.
Of cause using the AP_MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST() is much more elegant,
since the code is than compatible with httpd 2.x
Mario Brandt wrote on Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 19:32:03 +0100:
> Hi Daniel,
> > (At the time of this writing, httpd-2.4.1 is not blessed as GA.)
>
> It was, but the announcement was out that time. However not it is released ;-)
>
It wasn't on the download page yet. I'm not going to split hairs as t
Hi Daniel,
> (At the time of this writing, httpd-2.4.1 is not blessed as GA.)
It was, but the announcement was out that time. However not it is released ;-)
> Are you sure your compiler's include path (-I flags) is correct, and not
> picking up any httpd-2.x headers?
I'm sure I picked up the r
[please paste inline in the future, if it's reasonably sized.]
Mario Brandt wrote on Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 23:49:14 +0100:
> Hi,
> it fails to build the mod_dav_svn against apache 2.4.1
>
(At the time of this writing, httpd-2.4.1 is not blessed as GA.)
> the build errors http://pastebin.com/raw.
The whole build log http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=evBEMKep
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 23:49, Mario Brandt wrote:
> Hi,
> it fails to build the mod_dav_svn against apache 2.4.1
>
> the build errors http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Q3b08hDy
>
> Any idea how to fix that?
>
>
> Cheers
> Mario
Hi,
it fails to build the mod_dav_svn against apache 2.4.1
the build errors http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Q3b08hDy
Any idea how to fix that?
Cheers
Mario
12 matches
Mail list logo
