On 14.11.2016 10:34, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 11.11.2016 01:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 06.11.2016 13:47, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 05.11.2016 17:51, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
I don't see noticable performance issues at all while reparsing the
little files every time right now (how big/comple
On 11.11.2016 01:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 06.11.2016 13:47, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 05.11.2016 17:51, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
I don't see noticable performance issues at all while reparsing the
little files every time right now (how big/complex is the average authz
file?)
I remember gen
On 06.11.2016 13:47, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 05.11.2016 17:51, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> I don't see noticable performance issues at all while reparsing the
>> little files every time right now (how big/complex is the average authz
>> file?)
>
> I remember generated authz files > 10MB. Tha
On 05.11.2016 17:51, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
On 11/05/2016 05:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Hans van Kranenburg wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 16:39:44 +0100:
On 11/05/2016 11:44 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Looking at your workaround, I think the cleanest solution would be to
introduce an Authz
Hans van Kranenburg wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 17:51:13 +0100:
> On 11/05/2016 05:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Hans van Kranenburg wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 16:39:44 +0100:
> >> On 11/05/2016 11:44 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> >> I also guess that ideally the tests need to be updated with
On 11/05/2016 05:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hans van Kranenburg wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 16:39:44 +0100:
>> On 11/05/2016 11:44 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> Looking at your workaround, I think the cleanest solution would be to
>>> introduce an AuthzSVNDisableCache option.
>
> I'm not sur
Hans van Kranenburg wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 16:39:44 +0100:
> On 11/05/2016 11:44 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > Looking at your workaround, I think the cleanest solution would be to
> > introduce an AuthzSVNDisableCache option.
I'm not sure a knob to _disable_ caching is the right approach.
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 11/05/2016 11:44 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for the issue report! There seem to be two independent
> approaches that we could take to address the problem -- see below.
>
> On 05.11.2016 00:19, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> (please keep me in
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the issue report! There seem to be two independent
approaches that we could take to address the problem -- see below.
On 05.11.2016 00:19, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
(please keep me in Cc: since I'm not on the list (yet))
Hi,
We recently switched from using a htgroup file
(please keep me in Cc: since I'm not on the list (yet))
Hi,
We recently switched from using a htgroup file with apache2 to using the
/conf/authz file with AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile, for
performance reasons.
The authz files are really simple, like this:
[/]
f...@example.com = rw
b...@examp
10 matches
Mail list logo