2010/3/12 Johan Corveleyn :
> One annoyance with gmail: how do you view emails in fixed-width font?
> I haven't been able to find a good solution for this (making it hard
> to read mails with ascii tables like gstein's recent count-progress.py
> mail.
>
"Show original" and "Message text garbled?"
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> You can actually configure it to be Reply-All by default. I forget if it's a
> labs feature or something else, but that's one of the first things I did when
> I started using Gmail a couple of months ago.
I do the same. I also used th
On Mar 13, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:56, neels wrote
>
>> 3) with a "Reply all" button at the top right instead of just "Reply"
>
> It would be nice to have a Reply-All immediately there, but it is just
> one click away. I hit the drop-down, then hit Repl
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 17:28, neels wrote:
>...
> On 13 March 2010 09:29, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> When I sent the above I should have been more explicit
>> about my intent by linking to http://webchick.net/files/women-in-floss.pdf
>> I'd like to encourage everyone to please read these slides.
neels wrote on Sat, 13 Mar 2010 at 23:28 +0100:
> The drastically uneven male:female ratio in the Subversion project has
> actually worried me recently. My understanding of the nature of FLOSS
> would suggest a more or less even distribution, so I ask myself, why
> the heck are *all* of us svn devs
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:56, neels wrote:
> ...I must say gmail has a *very* decent interface for mailing. Now if
> someone could write this
>
> 1) as a client program instead of a blooming website
Use IMAP and your favorite client. It is just that I have not seen
such a nice client. I'm also "
I'd like to note, more verbosely, that I got carried away with that
post -- I was trying to demonstrate how all beauty disappears with a
var width font. I do not want to be associated with sexism nor trying
to irritate anyone. When I posted I simply wasn't aware enough that a
picture like this cou
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:14:35PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:56:42PM +0100, neels wrote:
> > [[[
> > ]]]
>
> I just see a log message.
> You forgot to attach the patch?
When I sent the above I should have been more explicit
about my intent by linking to http://
On 03/11/2010 06:26 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn dev mails :)
(I don't like to be part of a Big-Corp-Takes-Over-Everything scheme.)
~Neels
While we're bagging o
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:56:42PM +0100, neels wrote:
> [[[
> ?.$" `L ;;;, .`.`.`.`$;??h,_`h
> ?$ ""' `, `.`.`.`.hJ" `"??cc,$
> ?"???"??" j' :;;, .`.`.`.`$ $
> ;;,
...I must say gmail has a *very* decent interface for mailing. Now if
someone could write this
1) as a client program instead of a blooming website
2) with the ability to *SHOW FIXED WIDTH FONT* for crying out loud
3) with a "Reply all" button at the top right instead of just "Reply"
then that
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 at 03:26 +0100:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
>
> Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn dev mails :)
There are other mail providers (and some email clients) that filter
duplicates auto
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:14 AM, neels wrote:
>> On 12 March 2010 03:57, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:26, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
> Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a prob
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:14 AM, neels wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 03:57, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:26, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>> Mark Phippard wrote:
Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
>>>
>>> Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn
On 12 March 2010 03:57, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:26, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
>>
>> Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn dev mails :)
>> (I don't like to be part of a Big-Corp
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 21:26, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
>
> Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn dev mails :)
> (I don't like to be part of a Big-Corp-Takes-Over-Everything scheme.)
I'd be very surpr
Mark Phippard wrote:
> Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
Hm, I guess it would be ok to use gmail for svn dev mails :)
(I don't like to be part of a Big-Corp-Takes-Over-Everything scheme.)
~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Same here. Using GMail I didn't even know this was a problem.
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I don't see duplicates in Gmail, even when it nominally arrives from
multiple directions.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 20:29, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Julian Foad wrote:
Hoorrah!
heh,
I don't see duplicates in Gmail, even when it nominally arrives from
multiple directions.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 20:29, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> Hoorrah!
>
> heh, I got a triple "Hoorrah" in my inbox (one each via dev@, neels@ and
> commits@, I guess)
>
> Sometimes I wish t
Julian Foad wrote:
> Hoorrah!
heh, I got a triple "Hoorrah" in my inbox (one each via dev@, neels@ and
commits@, I guess)
Sometimes I wish the mail duplication would end ... but most of the time I
accept them as given. I have a 'remove duplicates' thing, but it requires
clicking twice to kick it
20 matches
Mail list logo
