I'd like to announce that #svn-dev is now logged.
You will find ChanServ telling you so whenever you join #svn-dev.
I've also added a note to the topic out of sheer enthusiasm, but I'd
be fine with removing that soon and only keeping the chanserv message
as #svn does.
And I'd like to emphasize ag
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:29 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > No, that has never been the reason why the channel isn't logged.
> >
> > If I remember correctly, the reason why #svn-dev isn't logged, is
> > because that would promote the id
hen I'm on the Net and have an IRC client
on, which is not all the time.
+1 on logging #svn-dev permanently and in a public location.
-K
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> No, that has never been the reason why the channel isn't logged.
>
> If I remember correctly, the reason why #svn-dev isn't logged, is
> because that would promote the idea of having discussions and making
> project-wide decisions on the ch
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 at 09:32 -0400:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:15:32PM +0200, neels wrote:
>>> I'm writing this mail to get "official" agreement that we want
>>> #svn-dev to be logged.
>> +1 as long as the /topic announces the fact at all times.
>>
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 at 09:32 -0400:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:15:32PM +0200, neels wrote:
> > I'm writing this mail to get "official" agreement that we want
> > #svn-dev to be logged.
>
> +1 as long as the /topic announces the fact at all times.
>
FWIW, on #svn we have
On 30 March 2010 15:47, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
[...]
> So, as long as this isn't going to lead to 'yeah, we discussed and
> decided this some time ago, just look it up in the irc-dev log' style
> of answers I'm okay with this.
The intention is to allow people that just joined or were split for a
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:15 PM, neels wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
> #svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
>
> I believe it was previously decided not to log #svn-dev because
> discussions about potential new committers took place there.
No, t
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:15:32PM +0200, neels wrote:
> I'm writing this mail to get "official" agreement that we want
> #svn-dev to be logged.
+1 as long as the /topic announces the fact at all times.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Deman
neels писал в своём письме Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:15:32
+0500:
Hi all,
every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
#svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
I believe it was previously decided not to log #svn-dev because
discussions about potential new committers took place there.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:15:32PM +0200, neels wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
> #svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
>
> I believe it was previously decided not to log #svn-dev because
> discussions about potential new committers took place the
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 14:15 +0200, neels wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
> #svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
+1. I don't say anything private that I wouldn't mind being recorded. I
would sometimes find it useful.
- Julian
> I believe it wa
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:15, neels wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
> #svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
>
> I believe it was previously decided not to log #svn-dev because
> discussions about potential new committers took place there. Since I
Hi all,
every now and then I would find it useful if there was a public log of
#svn-dev (on FreeNode IRC).
I believe it was previously decided not to log #svn-dev because
discussions about potential new committers took place there. Since I
joined the project, I have only seen new-committer discus
14 matches
Mail list logo
